Literature DB >> 21399382

Evolution of the New Pathway curriculum at Harvard Medical School: the new integrated curriculum.

Jules L Dienstag1.   

Abstract

In 1985, Harvard Medical School adopted a "New Pathway" curriculum, based on active, adult learning through problem-based, faculty-facilitated small-group tutorials designed to promote lifelong skills of self-directed learning. Despite the successful integration of clinically relevant material in basic science courses, the New Pathway goals were confined primarily to the preclinical years. In addition, the shifting balance in the delivery of health care from inpatient to ambulatory settings limited the richness of clinical education in clinical clerkships, creating obstacles for faculty in their traditional roles as teachers. In 2006, Harvard Medical School adopted a more integrated curriculum based on four principles that emerged after half a decade of self-reflection and planning: (1) integrate the teaching of basic/population science and clinical medicine throughout the entire student experience; (2) reestablish meaningful and intensive faculty-student interactions and reengage the faculty; (3) develop a new model of clinical education that offers longitudinal continuity of patient experience, cross-disciplinary curriculum, faculty mentoring, and student evaluation; and (4) provide opportunities for all students to pursue an in-depth, faculty-mentored scholarly project. These principles of our New Integrated Curriculum reflect our vision for a curriculum that fosters a partnership between students and faculty in the pursuit of scholarship and leadership.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21399382     DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2011.0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Biol Med        ISSN: 0031-5982            Impact factor:   1.416


  8 in total

1.  Early Clinical Experiences for Second-Year Student Pharmacists at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Lindsey B Amerine; Sheh-Li Chen; David N Luter; Justin Arnall; Shayna Smith; Mary T Roth; Philip T Rodgers; Dennis M Williams; Nicole R Pinelli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Resident-Perceived Benefit of a Diagnostic and Interventional Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Curriculum: A Multifaceted Approach Using Independent Study, Peer Teaching, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration.

Authors:  Jennifer Luz; Imran Siddiqui; Nitin B Jain; Minna J Kohler; Jayne Donovan; Paul Gerrard; Joanne Borg-Stein
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Radiology in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: Too Little, Too Late?

Authors:  Adam A Dmytriw; Philip S Mok; Natalia Gorelik; Jordan Kavanaugh; Peter Brown
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2015-04-18

4.  Applying Metacognition Through Patient Encounters and Illness Scripts to Create a Conceptual Framework for Basic Science Integration, Storage, and Retrieval.

Authors:  Eileen F Hennrikus; Michael P Skolka; Nicholas Hennrikus
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study.

Authors:  Bita Shahrvini; Sally L Baxter; Charles S Coffey; Bridget V MacDonald; Lina Lander
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  The Merits and Challenges of Three-Year Medical School Curricula: Time for an Evidence-Based Discussion.

Authors:  John R Raymond; Joseph E Kerschner; William J Hueston; Cheryl A Maurana
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba.

Authors:  P Ravi Shankar; Arun K Dubey; Ramanan Balasubramanium
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2013-09-30

8.  Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Sophie Eisenbarth; Thomas Tilling; Eva Lueerss; Jelka Meyer; Susanne Sehner; Andreas H Guse; Jennifer Guse Nee Kurré
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.