Literature DB >> 21398576

Preoperative analysis of the Hill-Sachs lesion in anterior shoulder instability: how to predict engagement of the lesion.

Seung Hyun Cho1, Nam Su Cho, Yong Girl Rhee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that engagement of the Hill-Sachs lesion affects postoperative recurrence of anterior shoulder instability. However, no method has been recognized as an effective preoperative means to predict engagement of the Hill-Sachs lesion.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the diagnostic validity of computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction to judge engagement of the Hill-Sachs lesion preoperatively. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: One hundred four consecutive patients (107 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability were enrolled for this study. Preoperatively, CT with 3D reconstruction was performed on all patients to evaluate the size (width and depth measured on axial and coronal images), orientation (Hill-Sachs angle), and location (bicipital and vertical angles) of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Dynamic arthroscopic examination was made to confirm engagement of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Then the correlation between the results and measurements on CT images was statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: In cases of engaging lesions, the mean width was 52% (range, 27%-66%) and the mean depth was 14% (range, 8%-20%) of the humeral head diameter on axial images. The corresponding measurements on coronal images were 42% (range, 16%-67%) and 13% (range, 5%-24%), respectively. In cases of nonengaging lesions, the corresponding measurements were 40% (range, 0%-71%) and 10% (range, 0%-21%) on axial images and 31% (range, 0%-62%) and 11% (range, 0%-46%) on coronal images. The size of engaging Hill-Sachs lesions was significantly larger than that of nonengaging lesions on both axial and coronal images (P = .001, < .001, .012, .007). The Hill-Sachs angle was 25.6° ± 7.4° in engaging lesions, which was significantly larger than 13.8° ± 6.2° in nonengaging lesions (P < .001). The bicipital and vertical angles did not demonstrate significant correlation with engagement of the Hill-Sachs lesion (P = .850, .584).
CONCLUSION: On CT with 3D reconstruction images, the engaging Hill-Sachs lesions were larger in size and more horizontally oriented to the humeral shaft than nonengaging lesions. The authors concluded that preoperative prediction of the engagement of the Hill-Sachs lesion, based on these findings, would be useful in planning additional procedures to treat a significant bone defect on the humeral head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21398576     DOI: 10.1177/0363546511398644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  33 in total

1.  Off-track Hill-Sachs lesions do not increase postoperative recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair with selective Remplissage procedure.

Authors:  In Park; Jun-Seok Kang; Yoon-Geol Jo; Sang-Woo Kim; Sang-Jin Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Management of humeral head deficiencies and glenoid track.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Giacomo; Andrea De Vita; Alberto Costantini; Nicola de Gasperis; Paolo Scarso
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 3.  Shoulder instability in the setting of bipolar (glenoid and humeral head) bone loss: the glenoid track concept.

Authors:  Suraj Trivedi; Michael L Pomerantz; Daniel Gross; Petar Golijanan; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The glenoid track: a review of the clinical relevance, method of calculation and current evidence behind this method.

Authors:  Yara Younan; Philip K Wong; Spero Karas; Monica Umpierrez; Felix Gonzalez; Jean Jose; Adam Daniel Singer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Return to sports after the latarjet procedure: high return level of non-collision athletes.

Authors:  Young Moon Kee; Jung Youn Kim; Hwan Jin Kim; Chan Teak Lim; Yong Girl Rhee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Current concepts in the management of recurrent anterior gleno-humeral joint instability with bone loss.

Authors:  Eamon Ramhamadany; Chetan S Modi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-18

Review 7.  Management of Glenoid Bone Loss with Anterior Shoulder Instability: Indications and Outcomes.

Authors:  Justin Rabinowitz; Richard Friedman; Josef K Eichinger
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  Imaging of shoulder instability.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Alberto Martínez Martínez; Pablo Tomás Muñoz; José Pozo Sánchez; Antonio Zarza Pérez
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-08

9.  Bone loss in anterior instability.

Authors:  Eiji Itoi; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Daisuke Kurokawa; Hirotaka Sano
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

10.  Bankart repair versus Bankart repair plus remplissage: an in vitro biomechanical comparative study.

Authors:  Jean Grimberg; Amadou Diop; Rony Bou Ghosn; Rosny Bou Ghosn; Dimitri Lanari; Adrien Canonne; Nathalie Maurel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.