Literature DB >> 21398364

Comparison of bioimpedance methods for estimating total body water and intracellular water changes during hemodialysis.

Yanna Dou1, Li Liu, Xuyang Cheng, Liyun Cao, Li Zuo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accurate assessment of body fluid volume is important in many clinical situations. Hannan et al. proposed a single-frequency bioimpedance equation (HE) to calculate extracellular water (ECW) and total body water (TBW). There are two equations based on the bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) method for the evaluation of body fluid volume: Xitron equations (XE) and body composition spectroscopy equations (BCSE). The aim of the study was to compare the accuracy of these three equations in body fluid volume point estimation in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.
METHODS: The BIS method was performed in MHD patients before and after a hemodialysis (HD) session. TBW, ECW and intracellular water (ICW) were calculated by XE, BCSE and HE, respectively. Hydration status (HS) was calculated using inputs of XE, BCSE and HE. ICW before dialysis was compared to ICW after dialysis. The change of TBW and HS using different equations was compared to actual ultrafiltration volume (AUV) that was calculated as weight difference of pre- to postdialysis.
RESULTS: Fifty MHD patients (27 females) were included in the study. Significant changes in ICW were observed using the XE and HE method with ultrafiltration (XE: 15.51 ± 5.07 versus 16.17 ± 5.34 L, P < 0.01; HE: 17.40 ± 5.13 versus 16.55 ± 4.71 L, P < 0.01). However, no significant ICW change was observed using BCSE (17.47 ± 4.35 versus 17.54 ± 4.36 L, P > 0.05). ΔTBW_XE and ΔTBW_HE were significantly different from AUV (XE 1.76 ± 0.89 versus 2.46 ± 0.89 L, P < 0.01; HE 4.16 ± 1.36 versus 2.46 ± 0.89 L, P < 0.01); however, ΔTBW_BCSE was much closer to AUV (2.27 ± 0.90 versus 2.46 ± 0.89 L, P = 0.129). The change of HS using inputs of BCSE was also closer to AUV (2.41 ± 0.86 versus 2.46 ± 0.89 L, P = 1.0).
CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that BCSE provided a better point estimation of ICW and TBW.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21398364     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  6 in total

1.  Agreement of single- and multi-frequency bioimpedance measurements in hemodialysis patients: an ancillary study of the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Daily Trial.

Authors:  Jochen G Raimann; Samer R Abbas; Li Liu; Fansan Zhu; Brett Larive; Peter Kotanko; Nathan W Levin; George A Kaysen
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2014-11-07

2.  Association between body composition and frailty among prevalent hemodialysis patients: a US Renal Data System special study.

Authors:  Kirsten L Johansen; Lorien S Dalrymple; Cynthia Delgado; George A Kaysen; John Kornak; Barbara Grimes; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  A comparison of fluid status determination using bioelectric impedance and the isotope dilution method in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Yanna Dou; Yanan Gong; Afang Li; Peipei Wang; Dongyan Song; Yuyang Wang; Dong Liu; Genyang Cheng; Zhanzheng Zhao
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.222

4.  Comparison of bioimpedance and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for measurement of fat mass in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Alessio Molfino; Burl R Don; George A Kaysen
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2013-05-09

Review 5.  Assessment of uremic sarcopenia in dialysis patients: An update.

Authors:  Yu-Li Lin; Bang-Gee Hsu
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2021-07-16

6.  Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Improvement of Left Ventricular Function After Renal Transplantation Is Related with Multiple Parameters".

Authors:  Emre K Aslanger; Ayça Türer Cabbar
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.