Literature DB >> 21398084

An advance directive in two questions.

Margaret M Mahon1.   

Abstract

It has been two decades since advance directives have become an integral part of health care. Impediments to their optimal usage are common and multifactorial. Decisions commonly have to be made when patients are unable to do so or choose not to participate in decision making, often at the end of life. The use of two questions, 1) "If you cannot, or choose not to participate in health care decisions, with whom should we speak?" and 2) "If you cannot, or choose not to participate in decision making, what should we consider when making decisions about your care?," may accomplish the major goals of an advance directive.
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21398084     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  4 in total

Review 1.  Physician perspectives on resuscitation status and DNR order in elderly cancer patients.

Authors:  Sachin Trivedi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-01-16

2.  Associated factors for discussing advance directives with family physicians by noncancer outpatients in Japan.

Authors:  Shuhei Hamada; Junji Haruta; Jun Hamano; Takami Maeno; Tetsuhiro Maeno
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2019-02-20

Review 3.  Barriers to the composition and implementation of advance directives in oncology: a literature review.

Authors:  Pedro Grachinski Buiar; José Roberto Goldim
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-11-12

Review 4.  Ethical considerations at the end-of-life care.

Authors:  Melahat Akdeniz; Bülent Yardımcı; Ethem Kavukcu
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-03-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.