Literature DB >> 21398054

[Serum AMH level is not a predictive value for IVF in modified natural cycle: analysis of 342 cycles].

F Lamazou1, V Genro, F Fuchs, M Grynberg, V Gallot, N Achour-Frydman, R Fanchin, R Frydman.   

Abstract

The objective is to compare the IVF procedures in modified natural cycle outcomes according to serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels. We included in this retrospective study 342 patients undergoing their first IVF in modified natural cycle. Patients were regrouped in three groups according to their serum AMH level: group 1 was defined by patients with AMH level<0.97 ng/mL (<25th percentile), group 2, patients with AMH level between 0.97 ng/mL and 2.60 ng/mL (25-75th percentile), and group 3, patients with AMH level between 2.61 ng/mL and 6.99 ng/mL (>75th percentile). The main outcomes were cancellation rate, embryo transfer rate and clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate. No difference has been observed on cancellation rate, embryo transfer rate, clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate. The ongoing pregnancy rate per IVF cycle was respectively: 12.8±3.6% for AMH inferior to 0.97 ng/mL versus 12.5±2.5% for AMH between 0.97 to 2.60 ng/mL and 13.4±4.2% for AMH between 2.61 ng/mL and 6.99 ng/mL. In conclusion, IVF in modified natural cycles procedures should be considered as an option for patients with an altered ovarian reserve defined by a serum AMH inferior to 1 ng/mL. Serum AMH level seems a quantitative marker of the ovary but not a quality factor. Serum AMH level does not seem to be a prognostic factor for ongoing pregnancy rated in IVF modified cycles.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21398054     DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)        ISSN: 0150-9918


  5 in total

1.  Circulating LH/hCG receptor (LHCGR) may identify pre-treatment IVF patients at risk of OHSS and poor implantation.

Authors:  Anne E Chambers; Krishnaveni P Nayini; Walter E Mills; Gillian M Lockwood; Subhasis Banerjee
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 5.211

2.  The predictive value of serum concentrations of anti-Müllerian hormone for oocyte quality, fertilization, and implantation.

Authors:  Edson Borges; Daniela P A F Braga; Amanda Setti; Rita de Cássia Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01

3.  Predictive Factors for Live Birth in Fresh In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Treatment in Poor Ovarian Reserve Patients Classified by the POSEIDON Criteria.

Authors:  Fei Li; Tian Ye; Huijuan Kong; Jing Li; Linli Hu; HaiXia Jin; YiHong Guo; Gang Li
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  High anti-Müllerian hormone levels might not reflect the likelihood of clinical pregnancy rate in IVF/ICSI treatment.

Authors:  Tie-Cheng Sun; Shan-Jie Zhou; Ling-Li Song; Jian-Hua Li; Xi Chen; Li Tian
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Prediction of pregnancy outcome in fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment in patients with poor ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Ying Chen; AiQin Niu; XingMei Feng; YaLi Zhang; Fei Li
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.682

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.