Literature DB >> 21397884

Determinants of medication incident reporting, recovery, and learning in community pharmacies: a conceptual model.

Todd A Boyle1, Thomas Mahaffey, Neil J Mackinnon, Heidi Deal, Lars K Hallstrom, Holly Morgan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that the underreporting of medication errors and near misses, collectively referred to as medication incidents (MIs), in the community pharmacy setting, is high. Despite the obvious negative implications, MIs present opportunities for pharmacy staff and regulatory authorities to learn from these mistakes and take steps to reduce the likelihood that they reoccur. However, these activities can only take place if such errors are reported and openly discussed.
OBJECTIVES: This research proposes a model of factors influencing the reporting, service recovery, and organizational learning resulting from MIs within Canadian community pharmacies.
METHODS: The conceptual model is based on a synthesis of the literature and findings from a pilot study conducted among pharmacy management, pharmacists, and pharmacy technicians from 13 community pharmacies in Nova Scotia, Canada. The purpose of the pilot study was to identify various actions that should be taken to improve MI reporting and included staff perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of their current MI-reporting process, desired characteristics of a new process, and broader external and internal activities that would likely improve reporting. Out of the 109 surveys sent, 72 usable surveys were returned (66.1% response rate). Multivariate analysis of variance found no significant differences among staff type in their perceptions of the current or new desired system but were found for broader initiatives to improve MI reporting. These findings were used for a proposed structural equation model (SEM).
RESULTS: The SEM proposes that individual-perceived self-efficacy, MI process capability, MI process support, organizational culture, management support, and regulatory authority all influence the completeness of MI reporting, which, in turn, influences MI service recovery and learning.
CONCLUSIONS: This model may eventually be used to enable pharmacy managers to make better decisions. By identifying risk factors that contribute to low MI reporting, recovery, and learning, it will be possible for regulators to focus their efforts on high-risk sectors and begin to undertake preventative educational interventions rather than relying solely on remedial activities.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21397884     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  5 in total

1.  Patient-related risk factors for self-reported medication errors in hospital and community settings in 8 countries.

Authors:  Kim Sears; Andrea Scobie; Neil J Mackinnon
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2012-03

2.  Medication error detection in two major teaching hospitals: What are the types of errors?

Authors:  Fatemeh Saghafi; Amir H Zargarzadeh
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Perceptions and Attitudes towards Medication Error Reporting in Primary Care Clinics: A Qualitative Study in Malaysia.

Authors:  A Samsiah; Noordin Othman; Shazia Jamshed; Mohamed Azmi Hassali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Reducing medication errors in critical care: a multimodal approach.

Authors:  Rachel M Kruer; Andrew S Jarrell; Asad Latif
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-01

Review 5.  The role of organizational and professional cultures in medication safety: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Samantha Machen; Yogini Jani; Simon Turner; Martin Marshall; Naomi J Fulop
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.