Literature DB >> 21397373

Established users and the making of telecare work in long term condition management: implications for health policy.

Anne Rogers1, Sue Kirk, Claire Gately, Carl R May, Tracy Finch.   

Abstract

Increasingly policy for long term condition management is focussing on new technologies. Telecare is viewed as a means of making services more responsive, equitable, cost and clinically-effective and able to play a central part in mediating between service users, professionals, and service providers. It has also been identified as helping to establish patient self-management for long term conditions. In this paper we consider the social practices of the work of telecare integration and incorporation for patients, their interactions with professionals and the synergy or otherwise with policy makers' expectations for how patients approach, use and interact with services. The research took place in England and in Wales and involved qualitative interviews with 31 individuals. Our research suggests that, telecare services provide both an adequate substitution for traditional services and additional benefits such as minimising the need to travel and the added reassurance of regular external surveillance. However, the nature of patient work involved is 'low level' rather than requiring higher level interpretation of readings and decision making commensurate with realising a policy vision of more independent and responsible self -managers. Indeed a paradox of the reliance and acceptance of telecare is the creation of new relationships and dependencies rather than the diminution of reliance envisaged by policy. The illumination of practices around telecare provides evidence for policy makers and others to adjust the predictions and presumptions about how telecare might enable and promote more effective long term condition management.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21397373     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  19 in total

1.  Experiences of front-line health professionals in the delivery of telehealth: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Virginia MacNeill; Caroline Sanders; Ray Fitzpatrick; Jane Hendy; James Barlow; Martin Knapp; Anne Rogers; Martin Bardsley; Stanton P Newman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Barriers and Facilitators for Sustainability of Tele-Homecare Programs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kavita Radhakrishnan; Bo Xie; Amy Berkley; Miyong Kim
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  From theory to 'measurement' in complex interventions: methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument.

Authors:  Tracy L Finch; Frances S Mair; Catherine O'Donnell; Elizabeth Murray; Carl R May
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Making sense of technology adoption in healthcare: meso-level considerations.

Authors:  Carl R May
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  A mobile telehealth intervention for adults with insulin-requiring diabetes: early results of a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Justine Baron; Shashivadan Hirani; Stanton Newman
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-02-26

6.  Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Caroline Sanders; Anne Rogers; Robert Bowen; Peter Bower; Shashivadan Hirani; Martin Cartwright; Ray Fitzpatrick; Martin Knapp; James Barlow; Jane Hendy; Theti Chrysanthaki; Martin Bardsley; Stanton P Newman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Cartwright; Shashivadan P Hirani; Lorna Rixon; Michelle Beynon; Helen Doll; Peter Bower; Martin Bardsley; Adam Steventon; Martin Knapp; Catherine Henderson; Anne Rogers; Caroline Sanders; Ray Fitzpatrick; James Barlow; Stanton P Newman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-26

8.  Integrating mobile-phone based assessment for psychosis into people's everyday lives and clinical care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jasper E Palmier-Claus; Anne Rogers; John Ainsworth; Matt Machin; Christine Barrowclough; Louise Laverty; Emma Barkus; Shitij Kapur; Til Wykes; Shôn W Lewis
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  A comparison of two delivery modalities of a mobile phone-based assessment for serious mental illness: native smartphone application vs text-messaging only implementations.

Authors:  John Ainsworth; Jasper E Palmier-Claus; Matthew Machin; Christine Barrowclough; Graham Dunn; Anne Rogers; Iain Buchan; Emma Barkus; Shitij Kapur; Til Wykes; Richard S Hopkins; Shôn Lewis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  The feasibility and validity of ambulatory self-report of psychotic symptoms using a smartphone software application.

Authors:  Jasper E Palmier-Claus; John Ainsworth; Matthew Machin; Cristine Barrowclough; Graham Dunn; Emma Barkus; Anne Rogers; Til Wykes; Shitij Kapur; Iain Buchan; Emma Salter; Shôn W Lewis
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.