Literature DB >> 21396482

Mycophenolic acid response biomarkers: a cell line model system-based genome-wide screen.

Tse-Yu Wu1, Brooke L Fridley, Gregory D Jenkins, Anthony Batzler, Liewei Wang, Richard M Weinshilboum.   

Abstract

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is commonly used to treat patients with solid organ transplants during maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. Response to MPA varies widely, both for efficacy and drug-induced toxicity. A portion of this variation can be explained by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors, including genetic variation in MPA-metabolizing UDP-glucuronyltransferase isoforms and the MPA targets, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 and 2. However, much of the variation in MPA response presently remains unexplained. We set out to determine whether there might be additional genes that modify response to MPA by performing a genome-wide association study between basal gene mRNA expression profiles and an MPA cytotoxicity phenotype using a 271 human lymphoblastoid cell line model system to identify and functionally validate genes that might contribute to variation in MPA response. Our association study identified 41 gene expression probe sets, corresponding to 35 genes, that were associated with MPA cytotoxicity as a drug response phenotype (p<1×10(-6)). Follow-up siRNA-mediated knockdown-based functional validation identified four of these candidate genes, C17orf108, CYBRD1, NASP, and RRM2, whose knockdown shifted the MPA cytotoxicity curves in the direction predicted by the association analysis. These studies have identified novel candidate genes that may contribute to variation in response to MPA therapy and, as a result, may help make it possible to move toward more highly individualized MPA-based immunosuppressive therapy.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21396482      PMCID: PMC3138818          DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol        ISSN: 1567-5769            Impact factor:   4.932


  40 in total

Review 1.  Ribonucleotide reductase: a critical enzyme for cancer chemotherapy and antiviral agents.

Authors:  Nuno M F S A Cerqueira; Pedro A Fernandes; Maria J Ramos
Journal:  Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.169

2.  IMPDH1 gene polymorphisms and association with acute rejection in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  J Wang; J W Yang; A Zeevi; S A Webber; D M Girnita; R Selby; J Fu; T Shah; V Pravica; I V Hutchinson; G J Burckart
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Dcytb (Cybrd1) functions as both a ferric and a cupric reductase in vitro.

Authors:  Steven Wyman; Robert J Simpson; Andrew T McKie; Paul A Sharp
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 4.  Therapeutic monitoring of mycophenolate in transplantation: is it justified?

Authors:  Katherine Ann Barraclough; Christine Elizabeth Staatz; Nicole Maree Isbel; David Wayne Johnson
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 5.  Does the evidence support the use of mycophenolate mofetil therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice? A systematic review.

Authors:  Simon R Knight; Peter J Morris
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Genetic variants associated with carboplatin-induced cytotoxicity in cell lines derived from Africans.

Authors:  R Stephanie Huang; Shiwei Duan; Emily O Kistner; Christine M Hartford; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 6.261

7.  Identification of genomic regions contributing to etoposide-induced cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Wasim K Bleibel; Shiwei Duan; R Stephanie Huang; Emily O Kistner; Sunita J Shukla; Xiaolin Wu; Judith A Badner; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  Utility of lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Authors:  L Sie; S Loong; E K Tan
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Gemcitabine and cytosine arabinoside cytotoxicity: association with lymphoblastoid cell expression.

Authors:  Liang Li; Brooke Fridley; Krishna Kalari; Gregory Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Stephanie Safgren; Michelle Hildebrandt; Matthew Ames; Daniel Schaid; Liewei Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Genetic analysis of human traits in vitro: drug response and gene expression in lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Authors:  Edwin Choy; Roman Yelensky; Sasha Bonakdar; Robert M Plenge; Richa Saxena; Philip L De Jager; Stanley Y Shaw; Cara S Wolfish; Jacqueline M Slavik; Chris Cotsapas; Manuel Rivas; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Ellen Cahir-McFarland; Elliott Kieff; David Hafler; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Lymphoblastoid cell lines in pharmacogenomic discovery and clinical translation.

Authors:  Heather E Wheeler; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Establishment & characterization of lymphoblastoid cell lines from patients with multiple primary neoplasms in the upper aero-digestive tract & healthy individuals.

Authors:  Tabish Hussain; Ashwin Kotnis; Rajiv Sarin; Rita Mulherkar
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Eukaryotic LYR Proteins Interact with Mitochondrial Protein Complexes.

Authors:  Heike Angerer
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-12

4.  Molecular insight into thiopurine resistance: transcriptomic signature in lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Authors:  Laurent Chouchana; Ana Aurora Fernández-Ramos; Florent Dumont; Catherine Marchetti; Irène Ceballos-Picot; Philippe Beaune; David Gurwitz; Marie-Anne Loriot
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  In Silico and In Vitro Studies of Mycotoxins and Their Cocktails; Their Toxicity and Its Mitigation by Silibinin Pre-Treatment.

Authors:  Van Nguyen Tran; Jitka Viktorova; Katerina Augustynkova; Nikola Jelenova; Simona Dobiasova; Katerina Rehorova; Marie Fenclova; Milena Stranska-Zachariasova; Libor Vitek; Jana Hajslova; Tomas Ruml
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Impact of SLCO1B3 polymorphisms on clinical outcomes in lung allograft recipients receiving mycophenolic acid.

Authors:  Laneshia K Tague; Derek E Byers; Ramsey Hachem; Daniel Kreisel; Alexander S Krupnick; Hrishikesh S Kulkarni; Catherine Chen; Howard J Huang; Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Genome-Wide Study of Response to Platinum, Taxane, and Combination Therapy in Ovarian Cancer: In vitro Phenotypes, Inherited Variation, and Disease Recurrence.

Authors:  Brooke L Fridley; Taraswi M Ghosh; Alice Wang; Rama Raghavan; Junqiang Dai; Ellen L Goode; Jatinder K Lamba
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Computational discovery of transcription factors associated with drug response.

Authors:  C Hanson; J Cairns; L Wang; S Sinha
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 9.  Mycotoxins: Biotransformation and Bioavailability Assessment Using Caco-2 Cell Monolayer.

Authors:  Van Nguyen Tran; Jitka Viktorová; Tomáš Ruml
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.546

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.