Literature DB >> 21395944

Continuous feeding of antimicrobial growth promoters to commercial swine during the growing/finishing phase does not modify faecal community erythromycin resistance or community structure.

M Kalmokoff1, L M Waddington, M Thomas, K-L Liang, C Ma, E Topp, U Desranleau Dandurand, A Letellier, F Matias, S P J Brooks.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the effect of continuous feeding of antimicrobial growth promoters (tylosin or virginiamycin) on the swine faecal community. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study consisted of two separate on-farm feeding trials. Swine were fed rations containing tylosin (44 or 88 mg kg(-1) of feed) or virginiamycin (11 or 22 mg kg(-1) of feed) continuously over the growing/finishing phases. The temporal impact of continuous antimicrobial feeding on the faecal community was assessed and compared to nondosed control animals through anaerobic cultivation, the analysis of community 16S rRNA gene libraries and faecal volatile fatty acid content. Feeding either antimicrobial had no detectable effect on the faecal community.
CONCLUSIONS: Erythromycin methylase genes encoding resistance to the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS(B) ) antimicrobials are present at a high level within the faecal community of intensively raised swine. Continuous antimicrobial feeding over the entire growing/finishing phase had no effect on community erm-methylase gene copy numbers or faecal community structure. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Antimicrobial growth promoters are believed to function by altering gut bacterial communities. However, widespread MLS(B) resistance within the faecal community of intensively raised swine likely negates any potential effects that these antimicrobials might have on altering the faecal community. These findings suggest that if AGP-mediated alterations to gut communities are an important mechanism for growth promotion, it is unlikely that these would be associated with the colonic community.
© 2011 Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Journal of Applied Microbiology © 2011 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21395944     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04992.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  9 in total

1.  A longitudinal investigation of the effects of age, dietary fiber type and level, and injectable antimicrobials on the fecal microbiome and antimicrobial resistance of finisher pigs.

Authors:  Tara N Gaire; Noelle R Noyes; H Morgan Scott; Aaron C Ericsson; Kara Dunmire; Mike D Tokach; Chad B Paulk; Javier Vinasco; Boyd Roenne; T G Nagaraja; Victoriya V Volkova
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Non-therapeutic administration of a model antimicrobial growth promoter modulates intestinal immune responses.

Authors:  Estela Costa; Richard Re Uwiera; John P Kastelic; L Brent Selinger; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.181

3.  Antimicrobial growth promoters modulate host responses in mice with a defined intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Kirsty Brown; Sarah J M Zaytsoff; Richard R E Uwiera; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evaluating nursery pig responses to in-feed sub-therapeutic antibiotics.

Authors:  Emma T Helm; Shelby Curry; Julian M Trachsel; Martine Schroyen; Nicholas K Gabler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Tetracycline Resistant Campylobacter jejuni Subtypes Emanating from Beef Cattle Administered Non-Therapeutic Chlortetracycline are Longitudinally Transmitted within the Production Continuum but are Not Detected in Ground Beef.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Jenny F Gusse; Kathaleen E House; Tara G Shelton; Eduardo N Taboada
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-12-21

Review 6.  Timely Control of Gastrointestinal Eubiosis: A Strategic Pillar of Pig Health.

Authors:  Paolo Trevisi; Diana Luise; Federico Correa; Paolo Bosi
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-02-03

7.  Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle.

Authors:  Kristen L Reti; Matthew C Thomas; L Jay Yanke; L Brent Selinger; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.181

8.  Association between selected antimicrobial resistance genes and antimicrobial exposure in Danish pig farms.

Authors:  Anna Camilla Birkegård; Tariq Halasa; Kaare Græsbøll; Julie Clasen; Anders Folkesson; Nils Toft
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Practical implications of erythromycin resistance gene diversity on surveillance and monitoring of resistance.

Authors:  Jinlyung Choi; Elizabeth L Rieke; Thomas B Moorman; Michelle L Soupir; Heather K Allen; Schuyler D Smith; Adina Howe
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.194

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.