Literature DB >> 21395916

The British research evidence for recovery, papers published between 2006 and 2009 (inclusive). Part One: a review of the peer-reviewed literature using a systematic approach.

T Stickley1, N Wright.   

Abstract

This paper is the first in a series of two which reviews the contemporary British evidence-base relating to recovery in mental health over a 4-year period. This review uses a systematic approach analysing the British peer-reviewed literature relating to recovery and mental health. The second paper in the series reviews the non-peer-reviewed literature. Recovery is not a new concept; however, it has recently become increasingly prevalent in practitioner, policy and research discourses. In total 12 papers met the inclusion criteria. Five main themes emerged from the analysis: hope and optimism, meaning to life, activities promoting recovery, definitions and discourses and implications for mental health practice. By including only peer-reviewed literature this paper is in a strong position to analyse the theoretical development of the recovery concept and highlight future directions for recovery in mental health services.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21395916     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01662.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1351-0126            Impact factor:   2.952


  5 in total

Review 1.  International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review.

Authors:  M Slade; M Leamy; F Bacon; M Janosik; C Le Boutillier; J Williams; V Bird
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  The self-management of longer-term depression: learning from the patient, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eleni Chambers; Sarah Cook; Anna Thake; Alexis Foster; Sue Shaw; Rebecca Hutten; Glenys Parry; Tom Ricketts
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  'In most supermarkets food does not cost £3 per day …' The impact of the school food voucher scheme during COVID-19.

Authors:  Gurpinder Singh Lalli
Journal:  Br Educ Res J       Date:  2022-07-14

4.  Squaring the circle: a priority-setting method for evidence-based service development, reconciling research with multiple stakeholder views.

Authors:  Rebecca Hutten; Glenys D Parry; Thomas Ricketts; Jo Cooke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Care Coordination as Imagined, Care Coordination as Done: Findings from a Cross-national Mental Health Systems Study.

Authors:  Ben Hannigan; Alan Simpson; Michael Coffey; Sally Barlow; Aled Jones
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 5.120

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.