Dinko Rekić1, Daniel Röshammar, Jackson Mukonzo, Michael Ashton. 1. Unit for Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Department of Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. michael.ashton@gu.se
Abstract
AIMS: This study aimed to test whether a pharmacokinetic simulation model could extrapolate nonclinical drug data to predict human efavirenz exposure after single and continuous dosing as well as the effects of concomitant rifampicin and further to evaluate the weight-based dosage recommendations used to counteract the rifampicin-efavirenz interaction. METHODS: Efavirenz pharmacokinetics were simulated using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model implemented in the Simcyp™ population-based simulator. Physicochemical and metabolism data obtained from the literature were used as input for prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters. The model was used to simulate the effects of rifampicin on efavirenz pharmacokinetics in 400 virtual patients, taking into account bodyweight and CYP2B6 phenotype. RESULTS: Apart from the absorption phase, the simulation model predicted efavirenz concentration-time profiles reasonably well, with close agreement with clinical data. The simulated effects of rifampicin co-administration on efavirenz treatment showed only a minor decrease of 16% (95% confidence interval 13-19) in efavirenz area under the concentration-time curve, of the same magnitude as what has been clinically observed (22%). Efavirenz exposure depended on CYP2B6 phenotype and bodyweight. Increasing the efavirenz dose during concomitant rifampicin was predicted to be most successful in patients over 50 kg regardless of CYP2B6 status. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings, although based on a simulation approach using limited in vitro data, support the current recommendations for using a 50 kg bodyweight cut-off for efavirenz dose increment when co-treating with rifampicin.
AIMS: This study aimed to test whether a pharmacokinetic simulation model could extrapolate nonclinical drug data to predict humanefavirenz exposure after single and continuous dosing as well as the effects of concomitant rifampicin and further to evaluate the weight-based dosage recommendations used to counteract the rifampicin-efavirenz interaction. METHODS:Efavirenz pharmacokinetics were simulated using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model implemented in the Simcyp™ population-based simulator. Physicochemical and metabolism data obtained from the literature were used as input for prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters. The model was used to simulate the effects of rifampicin on efavirenz pharmacokinetics in 400 virtual patients, taking into account bodyweight and CYP2B6 phenotype. RESULTS: Apart from the absorption phase, the simulation model predicted efavirenz concentration-time profiles reasonably well, with close agreement with clinical data. The simulated effects of rifampicin co-administration on efavirenz treatment showed only a minor decrease of 16% (95% confidence interval 13-19) in efavirenz area under the concentration-time curve, of the same magnitude as what has been clinically observed (22%). Efavirenz exposure depended on CYP2B6 phenotype and bodyweight. Increasing the efavirenz dose during concomitant rifampicin was predicted to be most successful in patients over 50 kg regardless of CYP2B6 status. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings, although based on a simulation approach using limited in vitro data, support the current recommendations for using a 50 kg bodyweight cut-off for efavirenz dose increment when co-treating with rifampicin.
Authors: Bryan A Ward; J Christopher Gorski; David R Jones; Stephen D Hall; David A Flockhart; Zeruesenay Desta Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-04-03 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Rupert P Austin; Patrick Barton; Scott L Cockroft; Mark C Wenlock; Robert J Riley Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Evan T Ogburn; David R Jones; Andrea R Masters; Cong Xu; Yingying Guo; Zeruesenay Desta Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Niresh Hariparsad; Srikanth C Nallani; Rucha S Sane; Donna J Buckley; Arthur R Buckley; Pankaj B Desai Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Tanuja N Gengiah; Nicholas H G Holford; Julia H Botha; Andrew L Gray; Kogieleum Naidoo; Salim S Abdool Karim Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Huybrecht T'jollyn; Jan Snoeys; An Vermeulen; Robin Michelet; Filip Cuyckens; Geert Mannens; Achiel Van Peer; Pieter Annaert; Karel Allegaert; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Koen Boussery Journal: AAPS J Date: 2015-07-25 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Nageshwar R Budha; Tao Ji; Luna Musib; Steve Eppler; Mark Dresser; Yuan Chen; Jin Y Jin Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Cong Xu; Sara K Quinney; Yingying Guo; Stephen D Hall; Lang Li; Zeruesenay Desta Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Huybrecht T'jollyn; Jan Snoeys; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Lies De Bock; Pieter Annaert; Achiel Van Peer; Karel Allegaert; Geert Mannens; An Vermeulen; Koen Boussery Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.441
Authors: Marco Siccardi; Catia Marzolini; Kay Seden; Lisa Almond; Anna Kirov; Saye Khoo; Andrew Owen; David Back Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 6.447