Literature DB >> 21395458

Free-hand CT-based electromagnetically guided interventions: accuracy, efficiency and dose usage.

Tobias Penzkofer1, Philipp Bruners, Peter Isfort, Felix Schoth, Rolf W Günther, Thomas Schmitz-Rode, Andreas H Mahnken.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate computed tomography (CT) based electromagnetically tip-tracked (EMT) interventions in various clinical applications. An EMT system was utilized to perform percutaneous interventions based on CT datasets. Procedure times and spatial accuracy of needle placement were analyzed using logging data in combination with periprocedurally acquired CT control scans. Dose estimations in comparison to a set of standard CT-guided interventions were carried out. Reasons for non-completion of planned interventions were analyzed. Twenty-five procedures scheduled for EMT were analyzed, 23 of which were successfully completed using EMT. The average time for performing the procedure was 23.7 ± 17.2 min. Time for preparation was 5.8 ± 7.3 min while the interventional (skin-to-target) time was 2.7 ± 2.4 min. The average puncture length was 7.2 ± 2.5 cm. Spatial accuracy was 3.1 ± 2.1 mm. Non-completed procedures were due to patient movement and reference fixation problems. Radiation doses (dosis-length-product) were significantly lower (p = 0.012) for EMT-based interventions (732 ± 481 mGy x cm) in comparison to the control group of standard CT-guided interventions (1343 ± 1054 mGy x cm). Electromagnetic navigation can accurately guide percutaneous interventions in a variety of indications. Accuracy and time usage permit the routine use of the utilized system. Lower radiation exposure for EMT-based punctures provides a relevant potential for dose saving.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21395458     DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2011.553256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol        ISSN: 1364-5706            Impact factor:   2.442


  11 in total

1.  Image-Guided Biopsy in the Era of Personalized Cancer Care: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Research Consensus Panel.

Authors:  Alda L Tam; Howard J Lim; Ignacio I Wistuba; Anobel Tamrazi; Michael D Kuo; Etay Ziv; Stephen Wong; Albert J Shih; Robert J Webster; Gregory S Fischer; Sunitha Nagrath; Suzanne E Davis; Sarah B White; Kamran Ahrar
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 2.  Navigational Tools for Interventional Radiology and Interventional Oncology Applications.

Authors:  Monzer A Chehab; Waleed Brinjikji; Alexander Copelan; Aradhana M Venkatesan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  AngleNav: MEMS Tracker to Facilitate CT-Guided Puncture.

Authors:  Rui Li; Sheng Xu; William F Pritchard; John W Karanian; Venkatesh P Krishnasamy; Bradford J Wood; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  A miniature accelerometer-based guidance device for percutaneous computed tomography-guided punctures.

Authors:  Christoph Wilkmann; Nobutake Ito; Tobias Penzkofer; Peter Isfort; Hong-Sik Na; Michael Hennes; Catherine Disselhorst-Klug; Andreas H Mahnken; Christiane K Kuhl; Philipp Bruners
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Multimodality image fusion-guided procedures: technique, accuracy, and applications.

Authors:  Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh; Jochen Kruecker; Samuel Kadoury; Hicham Kobeiter; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Elliot Levy; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Intervention Planning Using a Laser Navigation System for CT-Guided Interventions: A Phantom and Patient Study.

Authors:  Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Clara Lee; Jan Bolck; Nagy N N Naguib; Boris Schulz; Katrin Eichler; Rene Aschenbach; Julian L Wichmann; Thomas J Vogl; Stephan Zangos
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Electromagnetic Real Time Navigation in the Region of the Posterior Pelvic Ring: An Experimental In-Vitro Feasibility Study and Comparison of Image Guided Techniques.

Authors:  Miguel Pishnamaz; Christoph Wilkmann; Hong-Sik Na; Jochen Pfeffer; Christoph Hänisch; Max Janssen; Philipp Bruners; Philipp Kobbe; Frank Hildebrand; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Computer assisted electromagnetic navigation improves accuracy in computed tomography guided interventions: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierre Durand; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Anne-Sophie Silvent; Julien Frandon; Emilie Chipon; Maud Médici; Ivan Bricault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Precision Imaging Guidance in the Era of Precision Oncology: An Update of Imaging Tools for Interventional Procedures.

Authors:  Chiara Floridi; Michaela Cellina; Giovanni Irmici; Alessandra Bruno; Nicolo' Rossini; Alessandra Borgheresi; Andrea Agostini; Federico Bruno; Francesco Arrigoni; Antonio Arrichiello; Roberto Candelari; Antonio Barile; Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Multimodality Fusion with MRI, CT, and Ultrasound Contrast for Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hayet Amalou; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2012-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.