Literature DB >> 21395362

A systematic review on the treatment of acute ankle sprain: brace versus other functional treatment types.

Ellen Kemler1, Ingrid van de Port, Frank Backx, C Niek van Dijk.   

Abstract

Ankle injuries, especially ankle sprains, are a common problem in sports and medical care. Ankle sprains result in pain and absenteeism from work and/or sports participation, and can lead to physical restrictions such as ankle instability. Nowadays, treatment of ankle injury basically consists of taping the ankle. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of ankle braces as a treatment for acute ankle sprains compared with other types of functional treatments such as ankle tape and elastic bandages. A computerized literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Clinical Trial Register. This review includes randomized controlled trials in English, German and Dutch, published between 1990 and April 2009 that compared ankle braces as a treatment for lateral ankle sprains with other functional treatments. The inclusion criteria for this systematic review were (i) individuals (sports participants as well as non-sports participants) with an acute injury of the ankle (acute ankle sprains); (ii) use of an ankle brace as primary treatment for acute ankle sprains; (iii) control interventions including any other type of functional treatment (e.g. Tubigrip™, elastic wrap or ankle tape); and (iv) one of the following reported outcome measures: re-injuries, symptoms (pain, swelling, instability), functional outcomes and/or time to resumption of sports, daily activities and/or work. Eight studies met all inclusion criteria. Differences in outcome measures, intervention types and patient characteristics precluded pooling of the results, so best evidence syntheses were conducted. A few individual studies reported positive outcomes after treatment with an ankle brace compared with other functional methods, but our best evidence syntheses only demonstrated a better treatment result in terms of functional outcome. Other studies have suggested that ankle brace treatment is a more cost-effective method, so the use of braces after acute ankle sprains should be considered. Further research should focus on economic evaluation and on different types of ankle brace, to examine the strengths and weaknesses of ankle braces for the treatment of acute ankle sprains.
© 2011 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21395362     DOI: 10.2165/11584370-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  50 in total

1.  Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Christopher G Maher; Catherine Sherrington; Robert D Herbert; Anne M Moseley; Mark Elkins
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-08

2.  [Functional versus plaster cast treatment of acute rupture of the fibular ligament of the upper ankle joint. A randomized clinical study].

Authors:  J Klein; D Rixen; T Albring; T Tiling
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?

Authors:  R P S Van Peppen; G Kwakkel; S Wood-Dauphinee; H J M Hendriks; Ph J Van der Wees; J Dekker
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 4.  Treatment for acute tears of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Operation, cast, or early controlled mobilization.

Authors:  P Kannus; P Renström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The value of mobilisation and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesia in the management of inversion injuries of the ankle.

Authors:  P G McCulloch; P Holden; D J Robson; D I Rowley; S H Norris
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1985-02

6.  Early ankle mobilization, Part I: The immediate effect on acute, lateral ankle sprains (a randomized clinical trial).

Authors:  J R Dettori; B D Pearson; C J Basmania; W M Lednar
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Treatment of acute ankle sprain. Comparison of a semi-rigid ankle brace and compression bandage in 73 patients.

Authors:  J Leanderson; T Wredmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-12

8.  Treatment of the inversion ankle sprain: comparison of different modes of compression and cryotherapy.

Authors:  G B Wilkerson; H M Horn-Kingery
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Degenerative arthritis of the ankle secondary to long-standing lateral ligament instability.

Authors:  K D Harrington
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Clinical and cost effectiveness of mechanical support for severe ankle sprains: design of a randomised controlled trial in the emergency department [ISRCTN 37807450].

Authors:  S E Lamb; R A Nakash; E J Withers; M Clark; J L Marsh; S Wilson; J L Hutton; A Szczepura; J R Dale; M W Cooke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  19 in total

1.  [Efficacy of Shangbai ointment in alleviating pain in patients with acute ankle joint lateral collateral ligament injury: a randomized controlled trial].

Authors:  Lin Zhou; Kai Sun; Yan Chen; Guo-Liang Chen; De-Jun Deng; Gen-Long Jiao; Zhi-Zhong Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-03-20

2.  Ankle Bracing is Effective for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Acute Ankle Injuries in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Ingrid Barelds; Anke G van den Broek; Bionka M A Huisstede
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Robust Longitudinal Ankle Edema Assessment Using Wearable Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Samer Mabrouk; Sinan Hersek; Hyeon Ki Jeong; Daniel Whittingslow; Venu G Ganti; Paul Wolkoff; Omer T Inan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Predicting poor outcome from simple ankle injuries: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Stuart A Bullock; Georgina M Allen; Marion S Watson; David J Wilson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Extremity CT and ultrasound in the assessment of ankle injuries: occult fractures and ligament injuries.

Authors:  Georgina M Allen; David J Wilson; Stuart A Bullock; Marion Watson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sacha Lardenoye; Ed Theunissen; Berry Cleffken; Peter Rg Brink; Rob A de Bie; Martijn Poeze
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Effects of soft bracing or taping on a lateral ankle sprain: a non-randomised controlled trial evaluating recurrence rates and residual symptoms at one year.

Authors:  Ellen Kemler; Ingrid van de Port; Sandor Schmikli; Bionka Huisstede; Arno Hoes; Frank Backx
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Robust Method for Mid-Activity Tracking and Evaluation of Ankle Health Post-Injury.

Authors:  Samer Mabrouk; Daniel Whittingslow; Omer T Inan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  The Effects of Whole Body Vibration on the Limits of Stability in Adults With Subacute Ankle Injury.

Authors:  Sonia Young; Harvey W Wallmann; Kailey L Quiambao; Brooke M Grimes
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-06-01

10.  Study protocol: the effect of whole body vibration on acute unilateral unstable lateral ankle sprain- a biphasic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sebastian Felix Baumbach; Mariette Fasser; Hans Polzer; Michael Sieb; Markus Regauer; Wolf Mutschler; Matthias Schieker; Michael Blauth
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.