Literature DB >> 21394530

Mechanical circulatory support-results, developments and trends.

Thomas Krabatsch1, Martin Schweiger, Alexander Stepanenko, Marian Kukucka, Juliane Vierecke, Hans B Lehmkuhl, Michael Huebler, Ewald Hennig, Evgenij Potapov, Roland Hetzer.   

Abstract

The implantation of ventricular assist devices (VADs) is a valuable option in patients with end-stage heart failure. The number of VAD implantations is growing worldwide. Between July 1987 and July 2010, we implanted 1,598 VADs in 1,455 patients. The majority were male (81.0%), and their mean age was 49.4 years (range 0.3-82 years). Indications for implantation were: cardiomyopathy (n = 1,074), post-cardiotomy heart failure (n = 282), acute myocardial infarction (n = 83), graft failure after heart transplantation (n = 64), and others (n = 61). In 55.5%, the VAD implanted was left ventricular, in 39.5% biventricular, and in 4.8% right ventricular. Until 1995, the implanted pumps were mostly pulsatile. Today, however, more than 95% of the implanted VADs are continuous-flow rotary pumps. The average support time was 148.6 days (range 0-1,836 days). The percentage of biventricular VADs has dropped over the years to 20% in 2009. Three hundred forty-seven patients could be successfully bridged to heart transplantation. In 122 patients (8.3%), the device could be explanted after myocardial recovery. In 2009, 31.4% of the patients were implanted for permanent support. During the study period, 521 patients could be discharged home or to a rehabilitation center. Implantation of ventricular assist devices is now an established treatment for patients with both acute and chronic end-stage heart failure. Small implantable left ventricular assist devices of the second and third generation are now broadly employed worldwide, with growing acceptance and decreasing complications. The percentage of biventricular support has dropped over the years to 20%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21394530     DOI: 10.1007/s12265-011-9268-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res        ISSN: 1937-5387            Impact factor:   4.132


  38 in total

1.  Simplified technique for implantation of a left ventricular assist system after previous cardiac operations.

Authors:  M Pasic; P Bergs; E Hennig; M Loebe; Y Weng; R Hetzer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Bridging to transplantability with a ventricular assist device.

Authors:  E V Potapov; Y Weng; M Jurmann; H Lehmkuhl; R Hetzer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Reverse remodeling of the myocardial extracellular matrix after prolonged left ventricular assist device support follows a biphasic pattern.

Authors:  Annette H Bruggink; Matthijs F M van Oosterhout; Nicolaas de Jonge; Bas Ivangh; Joyce van Kuik; Ron H A M Voorbij; Jack P M Cleutjens; Frits H J Gmelig-Meyling; Roel A de Weger
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  First successful bridge to myocardial recovery with a HeartWare HVAD.

Authors:  Clare Wood; Andrew Maiorana; Robert Larbalestier; Michael Lovett; Gillian Green; Gerry O'Driscoll
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Six-year experience of caring for forty-four patients with a left ventricular assist device at home: safe, economical, necessary.

Authors:  D L Morales; K A Catanese; D N Helman; M R Williams; A Weinberg; D J Goldstein; E A Rose; M C Oz
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Cardiac bioassist: results of the French multicenter cardiomyoplasty study.

Authors:  Juan C Chachques; Olivier Jegaden; Thierry Mesana; Yves Glock; Pierre A Grandjean; Alain F Carpentier
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2009-12

7.  Left ventricular assist system as a bridge to myocardial recovery.

Authors:  O H Frazier; T J Myers
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Left ventricular assist device and drug therapy for the reversal of heart failure.

Authors:  Emma J Birks; Patrick D Tansley; James Hardy; Robert S George; Christopher T Bowles; Margaret Burke; Nicholas R Banner; Asghar Khaghani; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Tricuspid annular motion as a predictor of severe right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Sarinya Puwanant; Karen K Hamilton; Charles T Klodell; James A Hill; Richard S Schofield; Timothy S Cleeton; Daniel F Pauly; Juan M Aranda
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ventricular assist devices: initial orientation.

Authors:  Martin Schweiger; Hitendu Dave; Frithjof Lemme; Olga Romanchenko; Michael Hofmann; Michael Hübler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Different surgical strategies for implantation of continuous-flow VADs-Experience from Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin.

Authors:  Thomas Krabatsch; Thorsten Drews; Evgenij Potapov; Yugo Weng; Miralem Pasic; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 3.  Mechanical circulatory support: devices, outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Carmelo A Milano; Alan A Simeone
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.214

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.