Literature DB >> 21393558

Addressing adoption and research design decisions simultaneously: the role of value of sample information analysis.

Claire McKenna1, Karl Claxton1,2.   

Abstract

METHODS: to estimate the cost-effectiveness of technologies are well developed with increasing experience of their application to inform adoption decisions in a timely way. However, the experience of using similarly explicit methods to inform the associated research decisions is less well developed despite appropriate methods being available with an increasing number of applications in health. The authors demonstrate that evaluation of both adoption and research decisions is feasible within typical time and resource constraints relevant to policy decisions, even in situations in which data are sparse and formal elicitation is required. In addition to demonstrating the application of expected value of sample information (EVSI) in these circumstances, the authors examine and carefully distinguish the impact that the research decision is expected to have on patients while enrolled in the trial, those not enrolled, and once the trial reports. In doing so, the authors are able to account for the range of opportunity cost associated with research and evaluate a number of RESEARCH
DESIGN: s including length of follow-up and sample size. The authors also explore the implications for research design of conducting research while the technology is approved for widespread use and whether approval should be withheld until research reports. In doing so, the authors highlight the impact of irrecoverable opportunity costs when the initial costs of a technology are compensated only by later gains in health outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21393558     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11399921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  18 in total

1.  A practical guide to value of information analysis.

Authors:  Edward C F Wilson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-effectiveness of using a gene expression profiling test to aid in identifying the primary tumour in patients with cancer of unknown primary.

Authors:  M B Hannouf; E Winquist; S M Mahmud; M Brackstone; S Sarma; G Rodrigues; P Rogan; J S Hoch; G S Zaric
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Development and Evaluation of an Approach to Using Value of Information Analyses for Real-Time Prioritization Decisions Within SWOG, a Large Cancer Clinical Trials Cooperative Group.

Authors:  Caroline S Bennette; David L Veenstra; Anirban Basu; Laurence H Baker; Scott D Ramsey; Josh J Carlson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information in Practice: Considerations from 3 Case Studies.

Authors:  Anna Heath; Natalia Kunst; Christopher Jackson; Mark Strong; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Gianluca Baio; Nicolas A Menzies; Hawre Jalal
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Cost effectiveness of a 21-gene recurrence score assay versus Canadian clinical practice in post-menopausal women with early-stage estrogen or progesterone-receptor-positive, axillary lymph-node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Bin Xie; Muriel Brackstone; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of multigene expression profiling assays to guide adjuvant therapy decisions in women with invasive early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Gregory S Zaric; Phillip Blanchette; Christine Brezden-Masley; Mike Paulden; Christopher McCabe; Jacques Raphael; Muriel Brackstone
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Cost-effectiveness of adding cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Chander Sehgal; Jeffrey Q Cao; Joseph D Mocanu; Eric Winquist; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Estimating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using the Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Sample: A Fast, Nonparametric Regression-Based Method.

Authors:  Mark Strong; Jeremy E Oakley; Alan Brennan; Penny Breeze
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Value of Information Analysis Applied to the Economic Evaluation of Interventions Aimed at Reducing Juvenile Delinquency: An Illustration.

Authors:  Hester V Eeren; Saskia J Schawo; Ron H J Scholte; Jan J V Busschbach; Leona Hakkaart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach.

Authors:  A C Bouman; A J ten Cate-Hoek; B L T Ramaekers; M A Joore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.