Literature DB >> 21393502

Mechanisms of abnormal systolic motion of the interventricular septum during left bundle-branch block.

Ola Gjesdal1, Espen W Remme, Anders Opdahl, Helge Skulstad, Kristoffer Russell, Erik Kongsgaard, Thor Edvardsen, Otto A Smiseth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a majority of patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB), there is abnormal leftward motion of the interventricular septum during the preejection phase. This motion was considered to be passive, caused by early rise in right ventricular (RV) pressure, and has therefore been excluded from most indices of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. If considered active, however, the leftward motion reflects onset of septal activation and should be included. We therefore investigated if the motion was a passive response to pressure changes or caused by active contraction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: LBBB was induced in 8 anesthetized dogs with micromanometers. Cardiac dimensions were measured by sonomicrometry and echocardiography. Induction of LBBB resulted in preejection leftward motion of the septum, simultaneously with shortening of septal segments (P<0.01). In each experiment, preejection septal shortening occurred against rising LV pressure, consistent with active contraction. Furthermore, the LV pressure-segment length relationships were shifted upward (P<0.01) relative to the passive elastic curve, indicating stiffening of septal myocardium, confirming an active mechanism. Initially, RV pressure increased faster than LV pressure, suggesting that the leftward septal motion may have a passive pressure component. However, the passive component appeared to play a minor role. The magnitude of preejection septal shortening was modified by load alterations.
CONCLUSIONS: Leftward preejection motion of the septum during LBBB is mainly a result of active septal contraction, whereas alterations in diastolic ventricular pressures modulate the amplitude of this motion. The findings imply that the preejection phase should be included when assessing LV dyssynchrony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21393502     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.961417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  17 in total

1.  Myocardial motion and deformation patterns in an experimental swine model of acute LBBB/CRT and chronic infarct.

Authors:  Nicolas Duchateau; Marta Sitges; Adelina Doltra; Juan Fernández-Armenta; Nuria Solanes; Montserrat Rigol; Luigi Gabrielli; Etelvino Silva; Aina Barceló; Antonio Berruezo; Lluís Mont; Josep Brugada; Bart Bijnens
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Sheep can be used as animal model of regional myocardial remodeling and controllable work.

Authors:  Jürgen Duchenne; Piet Claus; Efstathios D Pagourelias; Razvan O Mada; Joeri Van Puyvelde; Kathleen Vunckx; Eric Verbeken; Olivier Gheysens; Filip Rega; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Relation between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block: An electro- and vectorcardiographic study.

Authors:  Jan De Pooter; Milad El Haddad; Victor Kamoen; Thomas Tibin Kallupurackal; Roland Stroobandt; Marc De Buyzere; Frank Timmermans
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance features of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Giselle Revah; Vincent Wu; Peter R Huntjens; Eve Piekarski; Janice Y Chyou; Leon Axel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Tracking Early Systolic Motion for Assessing Acute Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Real Time.

Authors:  Manuel Villegas-Martinez; Magnus Reinsfelt Krogh; Øyvind S Andersen; Ole Jakob Sletten; Ali Wajdan; Hans Henrik Odland; Ole Jakob Elle; Espen W Remme
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Left Atrial Dyssynchrony in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Diastolic Dysfunction Matters but Left Bundle Branch Block Does Not.

Authors:  Chinami Miyazaki
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2019-10-29

7.  Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by cardiac magnetic resonance is greater in patients with strict vs nonstrict electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle-branch block.

Authors:  Linus G Andersson; Katherine C Wu; Björn Wieslander; Zak Loring; Terry F Frank; Charles Maynard; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon F Tomaselli; Robert G Weiss; Galen S Wagner; Martin Ugander; David G Strauss
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  The zebrafish as a novel animal model to study the molecular mechanisms of mechano-electrical feedback in the heart.

Authors:  Andreas A Werdich; Anna Brzezinski; Darwin Jeyaraj; M Khaled Sabeh; Eckhard Ficker; Xiaoping Wan; Brian M McDermott; Calum A Macrae; David S Rosenbaum
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure-strain loop area: a non-invasive index of myocardial work.

Authors:  Kristoffer Russell; Morten Eriksen; Lars Aaberge; Nils Wilhelmsen; Helge Skulstad; Espen W Remme; Kristina H Haugaa; Anders Opdahl; Jan Gunnar Fjeld; Ola Gjesdal; Thor Edvardsen; Otto A Smiseth
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Major Left Bundle Branch Block and Coronary Heart Disease-Are There Any Differences between the Sexes?

Authors:  Diana Gurzău; Alexandra Dădârlat-Pop; Bogdan Caloian; Gabriel Cismaru; Horaţiu Comşa; Raluca Tomoaia; Dumitru Zdrenghea; Dana Pop
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.