Literature DB >> 21393146

The DART trial: 'The doctor's dilemma' revisited.

Estevão Portela Nunes1, Beatriz Grinsztejn, Mauro Schechter.   

Abstract

Treatment of HIV infection in developing countries, particularly those in Africa, is still a major challenge to healthcare systems with limited laboratory resources. While drug costs have fallen to levels where antiretroviral therapy is now possible in these countries, and results suggest that adherence is as good as in developed countries, questions remain regarding the effect of scarce laboratory resources on treatment monitoring and, hence, outcome. The DART trial aimed to measure the effect of laboratory monitoring. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the differences between routine laboratory monitoring and monitoring driven by clinical events, and was conducted between January 2003 and December 2008 at sites in Uganda and Zimbabwe. The results indicate that clinically driven monitoring is likely to be more cost-effective in this resource-limited situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21393146     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  1 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness analysis of clinically driven versus routine laboratory monitoring of antiretroviral therapy in Uganda and Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Antonieta Medina Lara; Jesse Kigozi; Jovita Amurwon; Lazarus Muchabaiwa; Barbara Nyanzi Wakaholi; Ruben E Mujica Mota; A Sarah Walker; Ronnie Kasirye; Francis Ssali; Andrew Reid; Heiner Grosskurth; Abdel G Babiker; Cissy Kityo; Elly Katabira; Paula Munderi; Peter Mugyenyi; James Hakim; Janet Darbyshire; Diana M Gibb; Charles F Gilks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.