Literature DB >> 21392868

Mechanical properties of the human Achilles tendon, in vivo.

M Kongsgaard1, C H Nielsen, S Hegnsvad, P Aagaard, S P Magnusson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography has been widely applied for in vivo measurements of tendon mechanical properties. Assessments of human Achilles tendon mechanical properties have received great interest. Achilles tendon injuries predominantly occur in the tendon region between the Achilles-soleus myotendinous junction and Achilles-calcaneus osteotendinous junction i.e. in the free Achilles tendon. However, there has been no adequate ultrasound based method for quantifying the mechanical properties of the free human Achilles tendon. This study aimed to: 1) examine the mechanical properties of the free human Achilles tendon in vivo by the use of ultrasonography and 2) assess the between-day reproducibility of these measurements.
METHODS: Ten male subjects had the Achilles tendon moment arm length, Achilles tendon cross sectional area and free Achilles tendon length determined. All subjects performed isometric plantarflexion ramp contractions to assess between-day reproducibility on two separate days. Simultaneous ultrasonography based measurements of Achilles-soleus myotendinous junction and Achilles-calcaneus osteotendinous junction displacement together with Achilles tendon force estimates yielded free Achilles tendon mechanical properties.
FINDINGS: Free Achilles tendon maximal force, deformation and stiffness were 1924 (SD 229) N, 2.2 (SD 0.6) mm and 2622 (SD 534) N/mm on day 1. For between-day reproducibility there were no significant differences between days for free Achilles tendon mechanical properties. The between-day correlation coefficient and typical error percent were 0.81 and 5.3% for maximal Achilles tendon force, 0.85 and 11.8% for maximal Achilles tendon deformation and 0.84 and 8.8% for Achilles tendon stiffness respectively. Last, osteotendinous junction proximal displacement on average contributed with 71 (SD 12) % of proximal myotendinous junction displacement.
INTERPRETATION: This study, for the first time, presents an ultrasonography based in vivo method for measurement of free AT mechanical properties. The method is applicable for evaluation of free human Achilles tendon mechanical properties in relation to training, injury and rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21392868     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  25 in total

1.  Identifying factors related to Achilles tendon stress, strain, and stiffness before and after 6 months of growth in youth 10-14 years of age.

Authors:  Jennifer M Neugebauer; David A Hawkins
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Rat supraspinatus tendon responds acutely and chronically to exercise.

Authors:  Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney; Daniel J Torino; Rachel Baskin; Rameen P Vafa; Andrew F Kuntz; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-06-29

3.  Reproducibility of shear wave elastography measuresof the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Catherine Payne; Peter Watt; Mara Cercignani; Nick Webborn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Tendon motion and strain patterns evaluated with two-dimensional ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Laura A Chernak; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Quantification of Mechanical Properties in Healthy Achilles Tendon Using Continuous Shear Wave Elastography: A Reliability and Validation Study.

Authors:  Patrick Corrigan; Jennifer A Zellers; Phoebe Balascio; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Daniel H Cortes
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Viscoelastic properties of healthy achilles tendon are independent of isometric plantar flexion strength and cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Stephen M Suydam; Elizabeth M Soulas; Dawn M Elliott; Karin Gravare Silbernagel; Thomas S Buchanan; Daniel H Cortes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Ultrasound speckle tracking of Achilles tendon in individuals with unilateral tendinopathy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Christian Couppé; René B Svensson; Christian Orhammer Josefsen; Esben Kjeldgaard; S Peter Magnusson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Is echogenicity a viable metric for evaluating tendon properties in vivo?

Authors:  Stephen M Suydam; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Quantifying Achilles tendon force in vivo from ultrasound images.

Authors:  Taylor J M Dick; Allison S Arnold; James M Wakeling
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Mechanical compromise of partially lacerated flexor tendons.

Authors:  Jaclyn Kondratko; Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl; Roderic Lakes; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.