Literature DB >> 21392493

Acute toxicity of organic chemicals to Gammarus pulex correlates with sensitivity of Daphnia magna across most modes of action.

Roman Ashauer1, Anita Hintermeister, Eva Potthoff, Beate I Escher.   

Abstract

We investigated the sensitivity of the freshwater crustacean amphipod Gammarus pulex towards organic xenobiotic compounds in comparison to the sensitivity of the crustacean cladoceran Daphnia magna. In addition we studied the influence of the chemical's mode of action on the relationship between the sensitivity of G. pulex and that of D. magna. We tested the acute toxicity of twelve compounds (Malathion, Aldicarb, Carbofuran, 2,4-dichloroaniline, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene, 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, Ethylacrylate, 4-nitrobenzyl-chloride, Sea-nine, Imidacloprid) with different modes of action and physicochemical properties towards the freshwater amphipod G. pulex in laboratory experiments. Additional toxicity data was collected from the peer-reviewed literature and databases (data pairs for 44 chemicals in total). The chemicals were assigned to seven mode of action groups. The relationship between the sensitivity of G. pulex (48h-LC50s and 96h-LC50s) and that of D. magna (48h-EC50s) was investigated using regression analysis and correlation plots. G. pulex is two to three orders of magnitude more sensitive towards neonicotinoids than D. magna (P=0.0046, n=3). For organophosphates we found that D. magna is more sensitive than G. pulex by approximately a factor of six (P=0.0256, n=6). There was no significant difference between the sensitivity of D. magna and that of G. pulex in any of the other mode of action groups; however chemicals with the same mode of action grouped together in the same area of the correlation plot. Without the neonicotinoids 75% of all G. pulex toxicity data were within one order of magnitude of the D. magna data and 100% within two orders of magnitude. The regressions with all data and with all data minus neonicotinoids were both significant linear relationships with slopes around one and intercept around zero. Thus, G. pulex is generally equally sensitive towards organic xenobiotics as D. magna.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21392493     DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aquat Toxicol        ISSN: 0166-445X            Impact factor:   4.964


  10 in total

1.  Freshwater shrimps as sensitive test species for the risk assessment of pesticides in the tropics.

Authors:  Michiel A Daam; Andreu Rico
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Unexpected toxic interactions in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus pulex (L.) exposed to binary copper and nickel mixtures.

Authors:  Jérémie Charles; Grégorio Crini; François Degiorgi; Bertrand Sancey; Nadia Morin-Crini; Pierre-Marie Badot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Isolation and characterization of eleven novel microsatellite markers for fine-scale population genetic analyses of Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: Amphipoda).

Authors:  Vid Švara; Helge Norf; Till Luckenbach; Werner Brack; Stefan G Michalski
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Phylogeny meets ecotoxicology: evolutionary patterns of sensitivity to a common insecticide.

Authors:  John I Hammond; Devin K Jones; Patrick R Stephens; Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Environmental risk assessment of fluctuating diazinon concentrations in an urban and agricultural catchment using toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling.

Authors:  Roman Ashauer; Irene Wittmer; Christian Stamm; Beate I Escher
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Acute toxicity tests with Daphnia magna, Americamysis bahia, Chironomus riparius and Gammarus pulex and implications of new EU requirements for the aquatic effect assessment of insecticides.

Authors:  Theo C M Brock; René P A Van Wijngaarden
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates.

Authors:  L W Pisa; V Amaral-Rogers; L P Belzunces; J M Bonmatin; C A Downs; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C Krupke; M Liess; M McField; C A Morrissey; D A Noome; J Settele; N Simon-Delso; J D Stark; J P Van der Sluijs; H Van Dyck; M Wiemers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services.

Authors:  Madeleine Chagnon; David Kreutzweiser; Edward A D Mitchell; Christy A Morrissey; Dominique A Noome; Jeroen P Van der Sluijs
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Modelling survival: exposure pattern, species sensitivity and uncertainty.

Authors:  Roman Ashauer; Carlo Albert; Starrlight Augustine; Nina Cedergreen; Sandrine Charles; Virginie Ducrot; Andreas Focks; Faten Gabsi; André Gergs; Benoit Goussen; Tjalling Jager; Nynke I Kramer; Anna-Maija Nyman; Veronique Poulsen; Stefan Reichenberger; Ralf B Schäfer; Paul J Van den Brink; Karin Veltman; Sören Vogel; Elke I Zimmer; Thomas G Preuss
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Targeted metabolomics of Gammarus pulex following controlled exposures to selected pharmaceuticals in water.

Authors:  Cristian Gómez-Canela; Thomas H Miller; Nicolas R Bury; Romà Tauler; Leon P Barron
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 7.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.