Literature DB >> 21392444

Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in humans, Europe.

Brigitte A G L van Cleef1, Dominique L Monnet, Andreas Voss, Karina Krziwanek, Franz Allerberger, Marc Struelens, Helena Zemlickova, Robert L Skov, Jaana Vuopio-Varkila, Christiane Cuny, Alexander W Friedrich, Iris Spiliopoulou, Judit Pászti, Hjordis Hardardottir, Angela Rossney, Angelo Pan, Annalisa Pantosti, Michael Borg, Hajo Grundmann, Manica Mueller-Premru, Barbro Olsson-Liljequist, Andreas Widmer, Stephan Harbarth, Alexander Schweiger, Serhat Unal, Jan A J W Kluytmans.   

Abstract

To estimate the proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from humans that were sequence type (ST) 398, we surveyed 24 laboratories in 17 countries in Europe in 2007. Livestock-associated MRSA ST398 accounted for only a small proportion of MRSA isolates from humans; most were from the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, and Austria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21392444      PMCID: PMC3166010          DOI: 10.3201/eid1703.101036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was first associated with human disease in 2003, when a MRSA clone associated with a reservoir in pigs and cattle was isolated from a human. This clone was not typable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with SmaI macrorestriction digestion and belonged to multilocus sequence type (ST) 398 (). Since then, rates of MRSA ST398 carriage have been high (25%–35%) for persons in the Netherlands who have frequent contact with pigs and veal calves, but associated illness is rare (). However, in Europe, Asia, and the United States, invasive infections and a hospital outbreak of MRSA ST398 have been reported (). We estimated the proportion of MRSA isolates from humans in Europe in 2007 that were ST398.

The Study

Questionnaires were mailed to 43 laboratories in 23 European countries, selected on the basis of expertise and publications about MRSA. Questions asked for level of laboratory and typing methods used, number of MRSA isolates identified in 2007, number of these isolates that were typed, and number of typed isolates that were MRSA ST398. MRSA isolates were considered to be ST398 if they 1) belonged to multilocus ST398, 2) were spa types t011, t034, t108, t567, t571, t588, t753, t898, t899, t1184, t1254, t1255, t1451, t1456, t1457, t2123, t2330, t2383, t2582, or t3013 (4; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, unpub. data); or 3) were not typable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with SmaI macrorestriction digestion. Laboratories were asked to report data on clinical isolates only (as opposed to screening isolates) and to provide the distribution by body site. For each laboratory, the proportion of MRSA ST398 among all typed MRSA isolates from humans and the 95% Wilson confidence interval (CI) were calculated. For laboratories that typed all MRSA isolates, χ2 testing compared proportions of isolates from various body sites for MRSA ST398 isolates and for other MRSA isolates. For each country, we compared the proportions of MRSA ST398 among human MRSA isolates with number of pigs per km2, number of cattle <1 year of age (a surrogate for veal calves) per km2, and 2 indices multiplying these animal densities with human population densities. Criteria were that a laboratory had to report >100 MRSA isolates and type >25% of those isolates, thus leaving 14 national or regional laboratories from 12 countries. For Austria, data from 2 laboratories were pooled because these laboratories did not report duplicate isolates. For Denmark, only data on MRSA clinical isolates were used. Data for 2007 on midyear human population, pig production, and production of cattle <1 year of age were obtained from Eurostat (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu) except for pig production in Switzerland (Swiss Statistics, www.bfs.admin.ch) and Turkey (Turkstat, www.turkstat.gov.tr). Land area was obtained from The World Factbook (www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook). For Germany, 1 region with high pig density was considered separately from the rest of the country. Data for this region (Eurostat regional Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics code DEA3, corresponding to laboratory 8) were obtained from Eurostat, the Chamber for Agriculture Nordrhein-Westfalen: “Zahlen zur Landwirtschaft 2008” (www.landwirtschaftskammer.de/wir/pdf/zahlen-landwirtschaft-2008.pdf), and the statistical office of Nordrhein-Westfalen in Germany. Questionnaires were received from 24 laboratories (response rate 56%) in 17 countries. Data from Malta and Slovenia and from 1 laboratory in Italy were not analyzed because these laboratories did not type MRSA isolates. Among the remaining 15 countries, 8 countries reported a combined total of 8,262 MRSA isolates with typing results, of which 142 (1.7%, 95% CI 1.5–2.0%) were MRSA ST398 (Table 1). The proportions of MRSA ST398 per country were 0–11.9%; the countries with the highest proportion were the Netherlands (11.9%), Belgium (4.7%), Denmark (1.6%), and Austria (1.4%, pooled data). The proportion of isolates from blood was significantly lower for MRSA ST398 than for other MRSA clinical isolates. No difference was observed for other body sites (Table 2).
Table 1

Characteristics of laboratories that reported MRSA and livestock-associated MRSA ST398 isolates from human samples, Europe, 2007*

Laboratory no.CountryType of laboratorySource of MRSA isolatesNo. MRSA isolates receivedNo. MRSA isolates typedMRSA ST398 isolates
No. (%)95% CI
1AustriaNational refAll52352300–0.7
2AustriaNational refAll58658616 (2.7)1.7–4.4
3BelgiumNational refAll3291497 (4.7)2.3–9.4
4Czech RepublicNational refBlood371000–27.8
5DenmarkNational refAll65965914 (2.1)1.3–3.5
DenmarkNational refClinical3703706 (1.6)0.7–3.5
6FinlandNational refAll1,3231,3231 (0.1)0–0.4
7GermanyNational refClinical1,2931,2939 (0.7)0.4–1.3
8GermanyRegional refClinical86686637 (4.3)3.1–5.8
9GreeceNational refClinical33633600–1.1
10HungaryNational refAll365630†NA
11IcelandNational refClinical212100–15.5
12ItalyNational refClinical1081081 (0.9)0.2–5.1
13IrelandNational refClinical83269600–0.5
14The NetherlandsNational refClinical47847857 (11.9)9.3–15.1
15The NetherlandsLocalClinical12123 (25.0)8.9–53.2
16SwedenNational refAll1,1271,1278 (0.7)0.4–1.4
17SwitzerlandLocalClinical587650†NA
18SwitzerlandRegional refAll18218200–2.1
19SwitzerlandRegional refClinical646400–5.7
20SwitzerlandLocalAll807800–4.7
21TurkeyLocalClinical1986000–6.0

*MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; ST398, sequence type 398; CI, confidence interval; ref, reference laboratory; NA, not applicable.
†Not reported because laboratory typed <25% of MRSA isolates.

Table 2

Distribution of typed MRSA ST398 and other MRSA clinical isolates, by body site, 7 European countries, 2007*

Sample sourceNo. (%) typed clinical isolates
p value†
MRSA ST398, n = 113Other MRSA,
n = 3,435
Blood2 (1.8)343 (10.0) 0.004
Respiratory tract20 (17.7)451 (13.1)0.16
Skin and wound76 (67.3)2,312 (67.3)0.99
Urinary tract6 (5.3)173 (5.0)0.90
Other9 (8.0)156 (4.5)0.09

*Only data from 9 national or regional laboratories in the 7 countries that reported clinical isolates and typed all these isolates were included. Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; ST398, sequence type 398.
†χ2 test.

*MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; ST398, sequence type 398; CI, confidence interval; ref, reference laboratory; NA, not applicable.
†Not reported because laboratory typed <25% of MRSA isolates. *Only data from 9 national or regional laboratories in the 7 countries that reported clinical isolates and typed all these isolates were included. Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; ST398, sequence type 398.
†χ2 test. The proportion of MRSA ST398 among human MRSA isolates correlated with pig density (Spearman ρ = 0.79, p = 0.001) and with the index combining this density with human population density (Spearman ρ = 0.76, p = 0.002). The proportion of MRSA ST398 among human MRSA isolates also correlated, although less significantly, with the density of cattle <1 year of age (Spearman ρ = 0.61, p = 0.05) and with the index combining this density with human population density (Spearman ρ = 0.74, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Livestock-associated MRSA ST398 was reported from 8 of 15 European countries. Except for 4 countries and 1 region in Germany, the proportion of MRSA ST398 among MRSA isolates from humans was <2%, suggesting that in 2007 this livestock-associated clone contributed to only a small fraction of all MRSA in humans. A recent study of laboratories in 26 European countries during September 2006–February 2007 found no MRSA ST398 among S. aureus isolates from persons with invasive infections (). MRSA ST398 has been isolated from human samples from Austria (), the Netherlands (), Belgium (), Italy (), Spain (), Germany (), Portugal (), Denmark (), the Czech Republic (), Sweden (), and France (). This study demonstrated MRSA ST398 in human samples in Switzerland and Finland. Although few data have been published on the proportion of MRSA ST398 in Europe, Springer et al. () reported that during 2006 through mid-2008, among 1,043 human MRSA isolates in Austria, 21 (2.0%) were MRSA ST398, which is similar to the proportion (1.4%, pooled data) found in our study. Among isolates from blood, a significantly lower proportion were MRSA ST398 than other MRSA. This finding suggests that MRSA ST398 is associated with less severe disease, as indicated (). The proportion of MRSA ST398 among human MRSA isolates in European countries correlated with pig and veal calf densities and with an index combining pig or veal calf density and human population density. In addition to the well-documented risk factor of occupational exposure to pigs and veal calves, proximity of humans to pigs and veal calves may contribute to transmission of MRSA ST398 from animals to humans. However, the fact that farms are not equally distributed throughout a country may explain the higher proportion of MRSA ST398 among MRSA isolates from humans in certain European countries and regions. Use of readily available data bears some limitations. Laboratories were not randomly selected, which could result in selection bias. However, bias was limited because most laboratories were national reference laboratories that routinely collect MRSA isolates countrywide. Also, countries may have active national or local screening policies, may select which isolates to type, and may use typing techniques that are not always fully comparable. To minimize these variations, when possible we reported on data from clinical isolates only and excluded data from laboratories that reported few isolates and did not type most MRSA isolates. We also provided a list of MRSA spa types that at the time of the study had been identified as corresponding to MRSA ST398. Other spa types and multilocus sequence types belonging to the livestock-associated MRSA clones have been recently reported () and were not included in our study. This cross-national prevalence study found livestock-associated MRSA ST398 in human samples in several European countries. However, the relatively low proportion of MRSA ST398 among MRSA isolates from humans in most countries suggests that MRSA ST398 contributes to only a small fraction of all MRSA in humans.
  14 in total

1.  First outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in a Dutch hospital, June 2007.

Authors:  M W Wulf; A Markestein; F T van der Linden; A Voss; C Klaassen; C M Verduin
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2008-02-28

2.  Community-acquired MRSA and pig-farming.

Authors:  Xander W Huijsdens; Beatrix J van Dijke; Emile Spalburg; Marga G van Santen-Verheuvel; Max E O C Heck; Gerlinde N Pluister; Andreas Voss; Wim J B Wannet; Albert J de Neeling
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among veterinarians: an international study.

Authors:  M W H Wulf; M Sørum; A van Nes; R Skov; W J G Melchers; C H W Klaassen; A Voss
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new zoonotic agent?

Authors:  Burkhard Springer; Ulrike Orendi; Peter Much; Gerda Höger; Werner Ruppitsch; Karina Krziwanek; Sigrid Metz-Gercek; Helmut Mittermayer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  High risk for nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Danish veterinary practitioners.

Authors:  Arshnee Moodley; Emily C Nightingale; Marc Stegger; Søren S Nielsen; Robert L Skov; Luca Guardabassi
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 5.024

6.  Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs.

Authors:  Laurence Armand-Lefevre; Raymond Ruimy; Antoine Andremont
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Infection with Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus t034.

Authors:  Christina Welinder-Olsson; Kerstin Florén-Johansson; Leif Larsson; Sven Oberg; Lisbeth Karlsson; Christina Ahrén
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in swine farm personnel, Belgium.

Authors:  Olivier Denis; Carl Suetens; Marie Hallin; Boudewijn Catry; Ilse Ramboer; Marc Dispas; Glenda Willems; Bart Gordts; Patrick Butaye; Marc J Struelens
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in humans and animals, Central Europe.

Authors:  Wolfgang Witte; Birgit Strommenger; Christian Stanek; Christiane Cuny
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Geographic distribution of Staphylococcus aureus causing invasive infections in Europe: a molecular-epidemiological analysis.

Authors:  Hajo Grundmann; David M Aanensen; Cees C van den Wijngaard; Brian G Spratt; Dag Harmsen; Alexander W Friedrich
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  84 in total

1.  Swine exposure and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection among hospitalized patients with skin and soft tissue infections in Illinois: A ZIP code-level analysis.

Authors:  Glennon A Beresin; J Michael Wright; Glenn E Rice; Jyotsna S Jagai
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 2.  The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Germany.

Authors:  Robin Köck; Alexander Mellmann; Frieder Schaumburg; Alexander W Friedrich; Frank Kipp; Karsten Becker
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Distance to pig farms as risk factor for community-onset livestock-associated MRSA CC398 infection in persons without known contact to pig farms-A nationwide study.

Authors:  J C H Anker; A Koch; S Ethelberg; K Mølbak; J Larsen; M R Jepsen
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.702

4.  Asymptomatic carriage of sequence type 398, spa type t571 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in an urban jail: a newly emerging, transmissible pathogenic strain.

Authors:  Michael Z David; Jane Siegel; Franklin D Lowy; Diana Zychowski; Alexis Taylor; Caroline J Lee; Susan Boyle-Vavra; Robert S Daum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The mecA homolog mecC confers resistance against β-lactams in Staphylococcus aureus irrespective of the genetic strain background.

Authors:  Britta Ballhausen; André Kriegeskorte; Nina Schleimer; Georg Peters; Karsten Becker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Staphylococcus aureus CC398 clade associated with human-to-human transmission.

Authors:  Alex J McCarthy; Willem van Wamel; Stien Vandendriessche; Jesper Larsen; Olivier Denis; Cristina Garcia-Graells; Ann-Catrin Uhlemann; Franklin D Lowy; Robert Skov; Jodi A Lindsay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Previous healthcare exposure is the main antecedent for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage on hospital admission in Belgium.

Authors:  S Vandendriessche; M Hallin; B Catry; B Jans; A Deplano; C Nonhoff; S Roisin; R De Mendonça; M J Struelens; O Denis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  Methicillin resistant S. aureus in human and bovine mastitis.

Authors:  Mark A Holmes; Ruth N Zadoks
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Suspected goat-to-human transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398.

Authors:  Igor Loncaric; René Brunthaler; Joachim Spergser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Next-Generation Sequencing Confirms Presumed Nosocomial Transmission of Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Thijs Bosch; Sandra Witteveen; Anja Haenen; Fabian Landman; Leo M Schouls
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.