Literature DB >> 2139240

Extension-flexion radiographs for motion studies of the lumbar spine. A comparison of two methods.

E Putto1, K Tallroth.   

Abstract

Since abnormal motion is a quantitative phenomenon and present primarily in the two lowest vertebral spaces, a roentgen examination method yielding the maximum mobility would appear to be suitable. When performing extension-flexion radiographs of the lumbar spine, positioning of patients varies considerably. The present study describes a new examination method, yielding better mobility of the spine than any method earlier described. For the two lowest vertebral spaces, L4-5 and L5-S1, the new method implied significantly greater angular mobility and total angular mobility between L2-S1 than a previous method. Intra- and interobserver errors accounted for were acceptable and the accuracy of the measurements sufficient for clinical work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2139240     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199002000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Charge couple device-based system for 3-dimensional real time positioning on the assessment of segmental range of motion of lumbar spine.

Authors:  Ping Zhao; Li-jun Chen; Jing Guan; Li Pan; Hui Ding; Hai-shu Ding
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.978

2.  Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years.

Authors:  Dietrich Schlenzka; Ville Remes; Ilkka Helenius; Tommi Lamberg; Pekka Tervahartiala; Timo Yrjönen; Kaj Tallroth; Kalevi Osterman; Seppo Seitsalo; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Operative treatment of symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis and mild isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: direct repair of the defect or segmental spinal fusion?

Authors:  D Schlenzka; S Seitsalo; M Poussa; K Osterman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance.

Authors:  Gérard Morvan; Philippe Mathieu; Valérie Vuillemin; Henri Guerini; Philippe Bossard; Frédéric Zeitoun; Marc Wybier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Accuracy of the clinical examination to predict radiographic instability of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Sara R Piva; John D Childs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Standardized evaluation of long-term results after anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  M Pfeiffer; P Griss; M Haake; H Kienapfel; M Billion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lumbar spine mobility in Marfan syndrome. A clinical and radiological study.

Authors:  A Malmivaara; M L Laitinen; A Savolainen; K Tallroth; A Zitting; I Kaitila
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Interobserver reproducibility of radiographic evaluation of lumbar spine instability.

Authors:  Saulo de Tarso de Sá Pereira Segundo; Edgar Santiago Valesin; Mario Lenza; Durval do Carmo Barros Santos; Laercio Alberto Rosemberg; Mario Ferretti
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  Influence of core stability exercise on lumbar vertebral instability in patients presented with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Yahya Javadian; Mohammad Akbari; Ghoadamali Talebi; Mohammad Taghipour-Darzi; Naser Janmohammadi
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2015
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.