Literature DB >> 21392078

Current application of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance in the management of patients with severe psoriasis: a clinical audit against NICE guidance in seven National Health Service specialist dermatology units in England.

A Bewley1, R Cerio, M Clement, S Hunt, T Lucke, R Ratnavel, S Walton, F Percival.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis affects 1-2% of the U.K. population, with 20-30% of those affected having severe psoriasis managed with systemic therapies. Biological agents are a useful option when other systemic therapies have failed. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the U.K. has published three sets of guidance relating to the use of biological agents. AIM: To establish whether biological agents were being used in line with NICE guidance.
METHODS: The study was conducted in seven specialist dermatology units, and involved the retrospective collection of data from patients treated with biological agents since the introduction of the NICE guidance.
RESULTS: In total, 176 patients with 212 episodes of treatment were included in the study. Biologics were started for appropriately severe disease in 85% of cases (n = 180) and only after failure, intolerance or contraindication to standard systemic therapies in 97% of cases (n = 206). Etanercept was discontinued appropriately in responders before week 24 in only 12% (five of 60 responders). Across all agents, 40% (72 of 178 with continuity status) were continued on treatment despite not achieving an adequate response according to NICE criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: In the seven sites audited, compliance with national guidance was entirely appropriate in terms of therapy initiation; however, the requirement to discontinue etanercept in responders was rarely followed. Similarly, discontinuation of biologicals in nonresponders was not routine practice. This may indicate a reluctance of both patients and clinicians to withdraw an at least partly effective therapy from these refractory patients. © The Author(s). CED
© 2011 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21392078     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.04011.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol        ISSN: 0307-6938            Impact factor:   3.470


  3 in total

1.  [Pharmacoeconomics in uro-oncology: the concept of QALYs].

Authors:  B Poulsen Nautrup
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Implementation: Is Sufficient Evidence Available?

Authors:  Sophie Whyte; Simon Dixon; Rita Faria; Simon Walker; Stephen Palmer; Mark Sculpher; Stefanie Radford
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 3.  An evolution in switching therapy for psoriasis patients who fail to meet treatment goals.

Authors:  Francisco Kerdel; Martin Zaiac
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 2.851

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.