Literature DB >> 21392012

What works? Process evaluation of a school-based fruit and vegetable distribution program in Mississippi.

Susan C Potter1, Doris Schneider, Karin K Coyle, Gary May, Leah Robin, Jenna Seymour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the 2004-2005 school year, the Mississippi Department of Education, Office of Child Nutrition, initiated a pilot program to distribute free fruit and vegetable snacks to students during the school day. This article describes the first-year implementation of the Mississippi Fruit and Vegetable Pilot Program.
METHODS: The process evaluation addressed where, when, and how produce was distributed; what was distributed; challenges and successes; and recommended modifications. Five of the 25 program schools were selected to participate in the evaluation; selection was based on grade levels served and demographic characteristics. Data were collected from program staff (N = 11) and administrators (N = 6) via interviews and logs; student (N = 42) and parent (N = 19) focus groups; student questionnaires (N = 660); and school staff questionnaires (N = 207).
RESULTS: Distributing fresh fruit and vegetable snacks at school was well received by staff and students. Most schools distributed the fresh fruit and vegetable snacks at morning break in classrooms or a central courtyard. Twenty-two types of fresh fruit, 4 types of dried fruit, and 7 types of vegetables were served to students during the program year. Commonly distributed fruit included apples, oranges, pears, bananas, and tangerines. Carrots were the staple vegetable, followed by celery. Key challenges included getting students to try new foods and receiving the produce in a timely manner without spoiling. Main successes included seeing students try new fruit and vegetable snacks, having the program run smoothly, and teacher support.
CONCLUSIONS: The program fit well within the school structure and could be an effective component of a multifaceted approach to enhancing child nutrition.
© 2011, American School Health Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21392012     DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  10 in total

Review 1.  Influence of school architecture and design on healthy eating: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Leah Frerichs; Jeri Brittin; Dina Sorensen; Matthew J Trowbridge; Amy L Yaroch; Mohammad Siahpush; Melissa Tibbits; Terry T-K Huang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Student feedback to improve the United States Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program.

Authors:  Yi-Chun Lin; Alyce D Fly
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 1.926

3.  Implementation of strategies to increase adolescents' access to fruit and vegetables at school: process evaluation findings from the Boost study.

Authors:  Anne Kristine Aarestrup; Thea Suldrup Jørgensen; Sanne Ellegaard Jørgensen; Deanna M Hoelscher; Pernille Due; Rikke Krølner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Methods used to address fidelity of receipt in health intervention research: a citation analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Lorna Rixon; Justine Baron; Nadine McGale; Fabiana Lorencatto; Jill Francis; Anna Davies
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  School-Level Perspectives of the Ontario Student Nutrition Program.

Authors:  Mariam R Ismail; Jason A Gilliland; June I Matthews; Danielle S Battram
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01

6.  Early adolescents' physical activity and nutrition beliefs and behaviours.

Authors:  Miranda Hawks; Angela Bratton; Sandra Mobley; Vernon Barnes; Steven Weiss; Julie Zadinsky
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2022-12

7.  Teacher Evaluation of an Experiential Vegetable Education Program for Australian Primary Schools: Does Face-to-Face Training Add Value above Digital Training?

Authors:  Astrid A M Poelman; Maeva Cochet-Broch; Janne Beelen; Bonnie Wiggins; Jessica E Heffernan; David N Cox
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Implementing a free school-based fruit and vegetable programme: barriers and facilitators experienced by pupils, teachers and produce suppliers in the Boost study.

Authors:  Anne Kristine Aarestrup; Rikke Krølner; Thea Suldrup Jørgensen; Alexandra Evans; Pernille Due; Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Process evaluation design in a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study.

Authors:  Tania L Griffin; Miranda J Pallan; Joanne L Clarke; Emma R Lancashire; Anna Lyon; Jayne M Parry; Peymane Adab
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 10.  Barriers and facilitators to implementation of direct fruit and vegetables provision interventions in kindergartens and schools: a qualitative systematic review applying the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).

Authors:  Biljana Meshkovska; Daniel A Scheller; Janine Wendt; Hannah Jilani; Marie Scheidmeir; Jan M Stratil; Nanna Lien
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.457

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.