Literature DB >> 21391777

Revised equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate based on the Lund-Malmö Study cohort.

Jonas Björk1, Anders Grubb, Gunnar Sterner, Ulf Nyman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To increase the accuracy of estimated GFR (eGFR) from creatinine overall and at measured GFR ≥90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) by revising the Lund-Malmö (LM) equations, to elaborate on more complex forms to improve the LM and CKD-EPI equations further, and to assess benefits of adding lean body mass (LBM).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Swedish Caucasians (n = 850, 376 women; median 60, range 18-95 years) referred for GFR measurement (plasma iohexol-clearance: median 55, range 5-173 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) constituted the Lund-Malmö Study cohort. Bias, precision, accuracy, expressed as median absolute percentage difference and percentage of estimates ±10% (P(10)) and ±30% (P(30)) of measured GFR, and classification ability with respect to five GFR stages were compared with the original LM, CKD-EPI and MDRD equations.
RESULTS: LM Revised overall performed better than LM Original without LBM due to increased accuracy at measured GFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Further extensions of the CKD-EPI or LM equations did not substantially improve overall performance. In particular, the performance of LM Revised at measured GFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) could not be improved further without decreasing accuracy and classification ability at lower GFR-levels. Adding LBM to the equations had no strong effect on accuracy.
CONCLUSION: Comparisons with the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations suggest that the LM equations are superior for the present Swedish population, due to markedly higher accuracy of the LM equations at measured GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). However, the LM equations cannot be recommended for use in general clinical practice until validated in other populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21391777     DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2011.557086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  47 in total

1.  Estimating glomerular filtration rate in children: evaluation of creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations.

Authors:  Cathrin L Salvador; Camilla Tøndel; Alexander D Rowe; Anna Bjerre; Atle Brun; Damien Brackman; Lars Mørkrid
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Performance of glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in a community-based sample of Blacks and Whites: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Lesley A Inker; Andrew S Levey; Hocine Tighiouart; Tariq Shafi; John H Eckfeldt; Craig Johnson; Aghogho Okparavero; Wendy S Post; Josef Coresh; Michael G Shlipak
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Validation of standardized creatinine and cystatin C GFR estimating equations in a large multicentre European cohort of children.

Authors:  Jonas Björk; Ulf Nyman; Ulla Berg; Pierre Delanaye; Laurence Dubourg; Karolien Goffin; Anders Grubb; Magnus Hansson; Karin Littmann; Kajsa Åsling-Monemi; Arend Bökenkamp; Hans Pottel
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Preventing contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury : Side-by-side comparison of Swedish-ESUR guidelines.

Authors:  Ulf Nyman; Joanna Ahlkvist; Peter Aspelin; Torkel Brismar; Anders Frid; Mikael Hellström; Per Liss; Gunnar Sterner; Peter Leander
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimating equations derived from creatinine and cystatin C: validation in the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik elderly cohort.

Authors:  Jonas Björk; Anders Grubb; Vilmundur Gudnason; Olafur S Indridason; Andrew S Levey; Runolfur Palsson; Ulf Nyman
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Diagnostic Performance of Creatinine-Based Equations for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Adults 65 Years and Older.

Authors:  Luciano da Silva Selistre; Dener L Rech; Vandréa de Souza; Jean Iwaz; Sandrine Lemoine; Laurence Dubourg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 7.  Calibration and precision of serum creatinine and plasma cystatin C measurement: impact on the estimation of glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Pierre Delanaye; Etienne Cavalier; Jean-Paul Cristol; Joris R Delanghe
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 8.  Estimating GFR prior to contrast medium examinations--what the radiologist needs to know!

Authors:  Ulf Nyman; Jonas Björk; Sten-Erik Bäck; Gunnar Sterner; Anders Grubb
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  An estimated glomerular filtration rate equation for the full age spectrum.

Authors:  Hans Pottel; Liesbeth Hoste; Laurence Dubourg; Natalie Ebert; Elke Schaeffner; Bjørn Odvar Eriksen; Toralf Melsom; Edmund J Lamb; Andrew D Rule; Stephen T Turner; Richard J Glassock; Vandréa De Souza; Luciano Selistre; Christophe Mariat; Frank Martens; Pierre Delanaye
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Comparison between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Cardiology Patients.

Authors:  Axel Åkerblom; Johanna Helmersson-Karlqvist; Mats Flodin; Anders Larsson
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.