Literature DB >> 21391769

Object-based neglect varies with egocentric position.

Hans-Otto Karnath1, André Mandler, Simon Clavagnier.   

Abstract

Different reference frames have been identified to influence neglect behavior. In particular, neglect has been demonstrated to be related to the contralesional side of the subject's body (egocentric reference frames) as well as to the contralesional side of individual objects irrespective of their position to the patient (object-based reference frame). There has been discussion whether this distinction separates neglect into body- and object-based forms. The present experiment aimed to prove possible interactions between object-based and egocentric aspects in spatial neglect. Neglect patients' eye and head movements were recorded while they explored objects at five egocentric positions along the horizontal dimension of space. The patients showed both egocentric as well as object-based behavior. Most interestingly, data analysis revealed that object-based neglect varied with egocentric position. Although the neglect of the objects' left side was strong at contralesional egocentric positions, it ameliorated at more ipsilesional egocentric positions of the objects. The patients showed steep, ramp-shaped patterns of exploration for objects located on the far contralesional side and a broadening of these patterns as the locations of the objects shifted more to the ipsilesional side. The data fitted well with the saliency curves predicted by a model of space representation, which suggests that visual input is represented in two modes simultaneously: in veridical egocentric coordinates and in within-object coordinates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21391769     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Biased temporal order judgments in chronic neglect influenced by trunk position.

Authors:  Christopher Rorden; Dongyun Li; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Allocentric neglect strongly associated with egocentric neglect.

Authors:  Christopher Rorden; Haukur Hjaltason; Paul Fillmore; Julius Fridriksson; Olafur Kjartansson; Sigridur Magnusdottir; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Egocentric representations of space co-exist with allocentric representations: evidence from spatial neglect.

Authors:  Dongyun Li; Hans-Otto Karnath; Christopher Rorden
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 4.  Are All Spatial Reference Frames Egocentric? Reinterpreting Evidence for Allocentric, Object-Centered, or World-Centered Reference Frames.

Authors:  Flavia Filimon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Ego- and allocentric visuospatial neglect: Dissociations, prevalence, and laterality in acute stroke.

Authors:  Nele Demeyere; Celine R Gillebert
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Lindy J Williams; Jocelyn Kernot; Susan L Hillier; Tobias Loetscher
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Virtual Reality and Eye-Tracking Assessment, and Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect: Systematic Review and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Alexander Pilgaard Kaiser; Kristian Westergaard Villadsen; Afshin Samani; Hendrik Knoche; Lars Evald
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-22

8.  Object-based neglect in number processing.

Authors:  Elise Klein; Korbinian Moeller; Daniela Zinsberger; Harald Zauner; Guilherme Wood; Klaus Willmes; Christine Haider; Alfred Gassner; Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.