Literature DB >> 21391760

The default network distinguishes construals of proximal versus distal events.

Diana I Tamir1, Jason P Mitchell.   

Abstract

Humans enjoy a singular capacity to imagine events that differ from the "here-and-now." Recent cognitive neuroscience research has linked such simulation processes to the brain's "default network." However, extant cognitive theories suggest that perceivers reliably simulate only relatively proximal experiences-those that seem nearby, soon, likely to happen, or relevant to a close other. Here, we test these claims by examining spontaneous engagement of the default network while perceivers consider experiencing events from proximal and distal perspectives. Across manipulations of perspective in four dimensions, two regions of the default network-medial prefrontal cortex and retrosplenial cortex-were more active for proximal than distal events, supporting cognitive accounts that perceivers only richly simulate experiences that seem immediate and that perceivers represent different dimensions of distance similarly. Moreover, stable individual differences in default activity when thinking about distal events correlated with individual variability in an implicit measure of psychological distance, suggesting that perceivers naturally vary in their tendency to simulate far-off or unlikely experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21391760     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  21 in total

1.  Reading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network.

Authors:  Diana I Tamir; Andrew B Bricker; David Dodell-Feder; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Social cognition and the cerebellum: A meta-analytic connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Frank Van Overwalle; Tine D'aes; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Regulating emotion through distancing: A taxonomy, neurocognitive model, and supporting meta-analysis.

Authors:  John P Powers; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Associations between psychopathic traits and brain activity during instructed false responding.

Authors:  Andrea L Glenn; Hyemin Han; Yaling Yang; Adrian Raine; Robert A Schug
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.376

5.  Multivariate Patterns of Posterior Cortical Activity Differentiate Forms of Emotional Distancing.

Authors:  John P Powers; John L Graner; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Autobiographical Planning and the Brain: Activation and Its Modulation by Qualitative Features.

Authors:  R Nathan Spreng; Kathy D Gerlach; Gary R Turner; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Rita Morais Tavares; Avi Mendelsohn; Yael Grossman; Christian Hamilton Williams; Matthew Shapiro; Yaacov Trope; Daniela Schiller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Common and distinct neural correlates of personal and vicarious reward: A quantitative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sylvia A Morelli; Matthew D Sacchet; Jamil Zaki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  From mind to matter: neural correlates of abstract and concrete mindsets.

Authors:  Michael Gilead; Nira Liberman; Anat Maril
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Involvement of the mentalizing network in social and non-social high construal.

Authors:  Kris Baetens; Ning Ma; Johan Steen; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.