Literature DB >> 21391174

[Radiological evaluation of tumor response in oncological studies (tumor response evaluation)].

B Gebauer1, O Bohnsack, H Riess.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiological-morphological response evaluation plays a major role in oncological therapy and studies for approval. Specific criteria have been developed for some tumor entities and chemotherapeutics. Application, limitations and definitions of the most frequently used criteria for tumor response evaluation will be presented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review based on a selective literature research.
RESULTS: In clinical oncological therapy studies, WHO and RECIST are the most frequently used criteria to evaluate morphological therapy response. RECIST criteria have been modified recently, especially with respect to the evaluation of lymph nodes, and were published as RECIST 1.1 in 2009. All criteria were originally developed and defined to review clinical multicenter trials for approval. Using these criteria in a clinical situation, certain limitations have to be considered. To evaluate response, a baseline scan before therapy start is mandatory. Special tumor response criteria have been defined for some certain tumor entities. Oncologists and radiologists should define in advance which criteria are used before starting therapy.
CONCLUSION: The use of defined criteria is very important in oncology response evaluation. In-depth knowledge of the criteria and their limits is required for correct usage. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21391174     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  4 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging to differentiate metastatic from non-metastatic retropharyngeal lymph nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  H Li; X-W Liu; Z-J Geng; D-L Wang; C-M Xie
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  More Reliance on PET-CT Findings.

Authors:  Reinhard Glaser
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  [Response criteria for malignant lymphoma].

Authors:  M K Ganten
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Prognostic value of different CT measurements in early therapy response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M W Huellner; T P Hennedige; R Winterhalder; T Zander; S K Venkatesh; W P Yong; R A Soo; B Seifert; T C Treumann; K Strobel; P Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.