Literature DB >> 21390874

The responsible conduct of bioethics research.

Zubin Master1.   

Abstract

The responsible conduct of research in the biomedical and behavioral sciences has received significant attention since the late 1980s. However, very little has been written about the responsible conduct of bioethics research. Bioethics is an interdisciplinary field and brings together divergent ethical standards and practices which may be the source of tension or conflict. This article argues that bioethicists should reflect more on ethical issues in the responsible conduct of bioethics research through examination of authorship practices and peer review. I also outline three possible approaches to promote research integrity in bioethics.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21390874     DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2011.557302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

1.  Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement.

Authors:  Daniela Cutas; David Shaw
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Criteria for authorship in bioethics.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Zubin Master
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Conflicts of interest policies for authors, peer reviewers, and editors of bioethics journals.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Kelly Werner; Elise Smith; David B Resnik; Bryn Williams-Jones
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2018-09-24

4.  Disciplining bioethics: towards a standard of methodological rigor in bioethics research.

Authors:  Daniel Adler; Randi Zlotnik Shaul
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.622

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.