| Literature DB >> 21390872 |
Abstract
Although widespread throughout the biomedical sciences, the practice of honorary authorship-the listing of authors who fail to merit inclusion as authors by authorship criteria-has received relatively little sustained attention. Is there something wrong with honorary authorship, or is it only a problem when used in conjunction with other unethical authorship practices like ghostwriting? Numerous sets of authorship guidelines discourage the practice, but its ubiquity throughout biomedicine suggests that there is a need to say more about honorary authorship. Despite its general acceptance among many scientists, honorary authorship is unethical. Even if burdensome, responsible researchers are obligated to forgo honorary authorship.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21390872 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2011.557297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Account Res ISSN: 0898-9621 Impact factor: 2.622