Literature DB >> 21390525

The role of phosphate on Omniscan(®) dechelation: an in vitro relaxivity study at pH 7.

Caroline Robic1, Robic Caroline, Sarah Catoen, Catoen Sarah, Marie-Christine De Goltstein, Goltstein De Marie-Christine, Jean-Marc Idée, Idée Jean-Marc, Marc Port, Port Marc.   

Abstract

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), a disease occurring in patients with severe renal failure, may be linked to injections of gadolinium chelates, contrast agents used for magnetic resonance imaging. A hypothesis frequently proposed to explain NSF is dissociation of Gd(3+) from its chelate, possibly from a deep storage compartment. Numerous in vivo and in vitro studies have been performed in an attempt to determine the extent of this dechelation and to understand its mechanism. Proton-assisted dechelation and transmetallation are the most widely described mechanisms of dechelation. This study investigated the possible ligand exchange role played by phosphate in the dechelation mechanism. Omniscan(®) dechelation was monitored in vitro by relaxivity measurements performed at physiological pH with different concentrations of phosphate buffer and in the presence of endogenous cations. Dechelation experiments performed on phosphate buffer alone showed that phosphate may induce gadolinium release by ligand exchange when the phosphate concentration in the buffer is higher than 130 mM for an Omniscan(®) concentration of 1.25 mM. This corresponds to a Gd/phosphate ratio of 10(-2). This ratio could be reached in vivo, especially in deep compartments such as bone. The presence of endogenous cations (Zn(2+), Cu(2+) or Ca(2+)) has also been demonstrated to accelerate the kinetics of gadolinium release, either by catalysing ligand exchange or by inducing a transmetallation mechanism. The Omniscan(®) formulation was also tested and the added Ca-DTPA-BMA was shown to increase dechelation kinetics in these experiments. This striking result may question the value of the Omniscan(®) formulation in the context of NSF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21390525     DOI: 10.1007/s10534-011-9422-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometals        ISSN: 0966-0844            Impact factor:   2.949


  6 in total

1.  Metal Chelating Crosslinkers Form Nanogels with High Chelation Stability.

Authors:  Jacques Lux; Minnie Chan; Luce Vander Elst; Eric Schopf; Enas Mahmoud; Sophie Laurent; Adah Almutairi
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 6.331

2.  Silica microparticles as a solid support for gadolinium phosphonate magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.

Authors:  Alexandra K Duncan; Piper J Klemm; Kenneth N Raymond; Christopher C Landry
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  High performance magneto-fluorescent nanoparticles assembled from terbium and gadolinium 1,3-diketones.

Authors:  Rustem Zairov; Asiya Mustafina; Nataliya Shamsutdinova; Irek Nizameev; Beatriz Moreira; Svetlana Sudakova; Sergey Podyachev; Alfia Fattakhova; Gulnara Safina; Ingemar Lundstrom; Aidar Gubaidullin; Alberto Vomiero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  T1 Shortening in the Cerebral Cortex after Multiple Administrations of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Zaw Aung Khant; Toshinori Hirai; Yoshihito Kadota; Rie Masuda; Takanori Yano; Minako Azuma; Yukiko Suzuki; Kuniyuki Tashiro
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Gadolinium Retention, Brain T1 Hyperintensity, and Endogenous Metals: A Comparative Study of Macrocyclic Versus Linear Gadolinium Chelates in Renally Sensitized Rats.

Authors:  Marlène Rasschaert; Andréa Emerit; Nathalie Fretellier; Cécile Factor; Philippe Robert; Jean-Marc Idée; Claire Corot
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Analytical interference in serum iron determination reveals iron versus gadolinium transmetallation with linear gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Nathalie Fretellier; Nathalie Poteau; Cécile Factor; Jean-François Mayer; Christelle Medina; Marc Port; Jean-Marc Idée; Claire Corot
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.016

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.