Literature DB >> 21390490

Geographical variation in host use of a blood-feeding ectoparasitic fly: implications for population invasiveness.

Panu Välimäki1, Arja Kaitala, Knut Madslien, Laura Härkönen, Gergely Várkonyi, Jari Heikkilä, Mervi Jaakola, Hannu Ylönen, Raine Kortet, Bjørnar Ytrehus.   

Abstract

Invasive generalist ectoparasites provide a tool to study factors affecting expansion rates. An increase in the number of host species may facilitate geographic range expansion by increasing the number of suitable habitats and by affecting local extinction and colonization rates. A geographic perspective on parasite host specificity and its implications on range expansion are, however, insufficiently understood. We conducted a field study to explore if divergent host specificity could explain the observed variation in expansion rates between Fennoscandian populations of the deer ked (Lipoptena cervi), which is a blood-feeding ectoparasitic fly of cervids. We found that the rapidly expanding eastern population in Finland appears to specialize on moose, whereas the slowly expanding western population in Norway breeds successfully on both moose and roe deer. The eastern population was also found to utilize the wild forest reindeer as an auxiliary host, but this species is apparently of low value for L. cervi in terms of adult maintenance, reproductive output and offspring quality. Abundant numbers of roe deer and white-tailed deer were observed to be apparently uninfected in Finland, suggesting that host use is not a plastic response to host availability, but rather a consequence of population-level evolutionary changes. Locally compatible hosts were found to be the ones sharing a long history with the deer ked in the area. Cervids that sustained adult deer keds also allowed successful reproduction. Thus, host use is probably determined by the ability of the adult to exploit particular host species. We conclude that a wide host range alone does not account for the high expansion rate or wide geographic distribution of the deer ked, although loose ecological requirements would increase habitat availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21390490     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1951-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  Lipoptena cervi (deer ked) in two naturally infested dogs.

Authors:  C Hermosilla; N Pantchev; R Bachmann; C Bauer
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Energy costs of blood digestion in a host-specific haematophagous parasite.

Authors:  Michal Sarfati; Boris R Krasnov; Lusine Ghazaryan; Irina S Khokhlova; Laura J Fielden; A Allan Degen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  New bedding site examination-based method to analyse deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) infection in cervids.

Authors:  Sirpa Kaunisto; Raine Kortet; Laura Härkönen; Sauli Härkönen; Hannu Ylönen; Sauli Laaksonen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 4.  Geographic range limits: achieving synthesis.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Unpredictable food and sexual size dimorphism in insects.

Authors:  O Leimar; B Karlsson; C Wiklund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Fennoscandian distribution of an important parasite of cervids, the deer ked (Lipoptena cervi), revisited.

Authors:  Panu Välimäki; Knut Madslien; Jonas Malmsten; Laura Härkönen; Sauli Härkönen; Arja Kaitala; Raine Kortet; Sauli Laaksonen; Reidar Mehl; Lisa Redford; Hannu Ylönen; Bjørnar Ytrehus
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Why do female Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) feed preferentially and frequently on human blood?

Authors:  L C Harrington; J D Edman; T W Scott
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Molecular detection of Bartonella schoenbuchensis from ectoparasites of deer in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Kotaro Matsumoto; Zenda L Berrada; Elissa Klinger; Heidi K Goethert; Sam R Telford
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.133

9.  Host plant and latitude-related diapause variation in Rhagoletis pomonella: a test for multifaceted life history adaptation on different stages of diapause development.

Authors:  H R Dambroski; J L Feder
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Experiments on the ectoparasitic deer ked that often attacks humans; preferences for body parts, colour and temperature.

Authors:  R Kortet; L Härkönen; P Hokkanen; S Härkönen; A Kaitala; S Kaunisto; S Laaksonen; J Kekäläinen; H Ylönen
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 1.750

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effects of an abundant ectoparasite, the deer ked (Lipoptena cervi), on the health of moose (Alces alces) in Finland.

Authors:  Tommi Paakkonen; Anne-Mari Mustonen; Reijo Käkelä; Sauli Laaksonen; Milla Solismaa; Jari Aho; Katri Puukka; Petteri Nieminen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Acute impacts of the deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) infestation on reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) behaviour.

Authors:  Sanna-Mari Kynkäänniemi; Maria Kettu; Raine Kortet; Laura Härkönen; Arja Kaitala; Tommi Paakkonen; Anne-Mari Mustonen; Petteri Nieminen; Sauli Härkönen; Hannu Ylönen; Sauli Laaksonen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Bartonella infections in deer keds (Lipoptena cervi) and moose (Alces alces) in Norway.

Authors:  Samuel Duodu; Knut Madslien; Eva Hjelm; Ylva Molin; Anna Paziewska-Harris; Philip D Harris; Duncan J Colquhoun; Bjørnar Ytrehus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Factors affecting deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) prevalence and infestation intensity in moose (Alces alces) in Norway.

Authors:  Knut Madslien; Bjørnar Ytrehus; Hildegunn Viljugrein; Erling J Solberg; Kent Rudi Bråten; Atle Mysterud
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Avian vampire fly (Philornis downsi) mortality differs across Darwin's finch host species.

Authors:  Lauren K Common; Petra Sumasgutner; Rachael Y Dudaniec; Diane Colombelli-Négrel; Sonia Kleindorfer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.