Literature DB >> 21389707

Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.

Flurin Pfiffner, Marco-Domenico Caversaccio, Martin Kompis.   

Abstract

The level of improvement in the audiological results of Baha(®) users mainly depends on the patient's preoperative hearing thresholds and the type of Baha sound processor used. This investigation shows correlations between the preoperative hearing threshold and postoperative aided thresholds and audiological results in speech understanding in quiet of 84 Baha users with unilateral conductive hearing loss, bilateral conductive hearing loss and bilateral mixed hearing loss. Secondly, speech understanding in noise of 26 Baha users with different Baha sound processors (Compact, Divino, and BP100) is investigated. Linear regression between aided sound field thresholds and bone conduction (BC) thresholds of the better ear shows highest correlation coefficients and the steepest slope. Differences between better BC thresholds and aided sound field thresholds are smallest for mid-frequencies (1 and 2 kHz) and become larger at 0.5 and 4 kHz. For Baha users, the gain in speech recognition in quiet can be expected to lie in the order of magnitude of the gain in their hearing threshold. Compared to its predecessor sound processors Baha(®) Compact and Baha(®) Divino, Baha(®) BP100 improves speech understanding in noise significantly by +0.9 to +4.6 dB signal-to-noise ratio, depending on the setting and the use of directional microphone. For Baha users with unilateral and bilateral conductive hearing loss and bilateral mixed hearing loss, audiological results in aided sound field thresholds can be estimated with the better BC hearing threshold. The benefit in speech understanding in quiet can be expected to be similar to the gain in their sound field hearing threshold. The most recent technology of Baha sound processor improves speech understanding in noise by an order of magnitude that is well perceived by users and which can be very useful in everyday life.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21389707     DOI: 10.1159/000323585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0065-3071


  4 in total

1.  Functional results after Bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Ingmar Seiwerth; Gerrit Götze; Cornelia Heider; Florian Radetzki; Michael Herzog; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Topographic bone thickness maps for Bonebridge implantations.

Authors:  Wilhelm Wimmer; Nicolas Gerber; Jérémie Guignard; Patrick Dubach; Martin Kompis; Stefan Weber; Marco Caversaccio
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant.

Authors:  Farid Alzhrani
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  The Bonebridge BCI 602 Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant in Children: Objective and Subjective Benefits.

Authors:  Katarzyna B Cywka; Henryk Skarżyński; Bartłomiej Król; Piotr H Skarżyński
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.