Literature DB >> 21389706

Complications of bone-anchored hearing devices.

Jack J Wazen, Benjamin Wycherly, Julie Daugherty.   

Abstract

Complications of bone-anchored hearing devices occur with both soft tissue and bone. Soft tissue complications are much more common and most often involve irritation of the skin surrounding the implant. Other complications include: skin flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, bleeding or hematoma formation, and persistent pain. Bone complications are classified as either early or late. Early complications are due to failure of osseointegration, while late complications are usually the result of either chronic infection or trauma. Pediatric patients are a unique group of implant patients and are more likely to have complications of both soft tissue and bone. Most complications can be managed in the office with topical therapy and wound care, although revision surgery may be required in extensive skin overgrowth cases. Proper patient selection, meticulous surgical technique, and patient hygiene around the implant are the most critical aspects in minimizing complications in patients with osseointegrated implants.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21389706     DOI: 10.1159/000323583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0065-3071


  9 in total

1.  Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Hannes Maier; Uwe Baumann; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Dirk Beutner; Marco D Caversaccio; Thomas Keintzel; Martin Kompis; Thomas Lenarz; Astrid Magele; Torsten Mewes; Alexander Müller; Tobias Rader; Torsten Rahne; Sebastian P Schraven; Burkard Schwab; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Bernd Strauchmann; Ingo Todt; Thomas Wesarg; Barbara Wollenberg; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Baha Attract: Our Experience.

Authors:  Hetal Marfatia; Keya Shah; Sheetal Shelke; Kartik Krishnan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

3.  Percutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Is It Clinically Useful in Korean?

Authors:  Sung Min Koh; Young Sang Cho; Ga-Young Kim; Mini Jo; Hye Yoon Seol; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.354

4.  Visualisation of the Bonebridge by means of CT and CBCT.

Authors:  Christian Güldner; Julia Heinrichs; Rainer Weiß; Annette Paula Zimmermann; Benjamin Dassinger; Siegfried Bien; Jochen Alfred Werner; Isabell Diogo
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.175

5.  Speech understanding with a new implant technology: a comparative study with a new nonskin penetrating Baha system.

Authors:  Anja Kurz; Mark Flynn; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A Comparative Study of a Novel Adhesive Bone Conduction Device and Conventional Treatment Options for Conductive Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Piotr H Skarzynski; Anna Ratuszniak; Kamila Osinska; Magdalena Koziel; Bartlomiej Krol; Katarzyna B Cywka; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  A Potential Interaction Between Bisphosphonates and Osseointegration of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implants Leading to Late Device Extrusion.

Authors:  Jeremy A Mock; Jena Patel; Arun Gadre; Scott Greene
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-29

8.  Stability Testing of a Wide Bone-Anchored Device after Surgery without Skin Thinning.

Authors:  Malou Hultcrantz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha.

Authors:  Tom Gawliczek; Wilhelm Wimmer; Fabio Munzinger; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.