Literature DB >> 21388821

Pulsatile pulmonary perfusion with oxygenated blood ameliorates pulmonary hemodynamic and respiratory indices in low-risk coronary artery bypass patients.

Francesco Santini1, Francesco Onorati, Mariassunta Telesca, Fabio Patelli, Giorgio Berton, Gianluigi Franchi, Giuseppe Faggian, Alessandro Mazzucco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Acute lung injury still accounts for postoperative mortality after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The safety and the efficacy of pulsatile pulmonary perfusion (PPP) during CPB were analyzed. Preliminary results of the first PPP trial in human beings are reported.
METHODS: Thirty low-risk coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients were prospectively randomized to receive PPP with oxygenated blood during CPB and aortic cross-clamping (15 patients, PPP-group) or to conventional CPB (15 patients, control group). Alveolo-arterial oxygen gradient (A-aDO(2)) was set as the primary end point and collected preoperatively, at intensive care unit (ICU) arrival (T1), 3h postoperatively (T2), and post extubation (T3). Secondary end points were collected at the same time points and consisted of respiratory indices (partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired O(2) (PaO(2)/FiO(2)), lung compliance, mixed-venous partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2))) and hemodynamic pulmonary parameters (indexed pulmonary vascular resistances (PVRI), pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and cardiac index (CI)). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was collected preoperatively, at ICU arrival (T1-BAL) and after 4h.
RESULTS: There were no PPP-related complications. Patients undergoing PPP showed a better preserved A-aDO(2) (group-p=0.001) throughout the study period (group × time-p = 0.0001). PaO(2)/FiO(2) and lung compliance were better preserved by PPP (group-p and group × time-p ≤ 0.05 for all). Pulmonary hemodynamic status was positively influenced by PPP, as shown by the higher CI (group-p=0.0001, group × time-p = 0.0001), and the lower PVRI, PAP, and PCWP (group-p ≤0.001, group × time-p=0.0001 for all). Postoperative BAL specimens demonstrated a lower absolute count of white blood cells (group-p=0.0001), a higher percentage of monocytes/macrophages (group-p=0.027), and a lower percentage of neutrophils (group-p=0.015) after PPP.
CONCLUSIONS: Oxygenated blood PPP proved safe and significantly ameliorated pulmonary hemodynamic parameters and respiratory indices in low-risk CABG.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21388821     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  8 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of lung injury in cardiac surgery: a review.

Authors:  Robert W Young
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-06

2.  Detailed statistical analysis plan for the pulmonary protection trial.

Authors:  Katrine B Buggeskov; Janus C Jakobsen; Niels H Secher; Thomas Jonassen; Lars W Andersen; Daniel A Steinbrüchel; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Lung Protection Strategies during Cardiopulmonary Bypass Affect the Composition of Blood Electrolytes and Metabolites-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Katrine B Buggeskov; Raluca G Maltesen; Bodil S Rasmussen; Munsoor A Hanifa; Morten A V Lund; Reinhard Wimmer; Hanne B Ravn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Pulmonary perfusion with oxygenated blood or custodiol HTK solution during cardiac surgery for postoperative pulmonary function in COPD patients: a trial protocol for the randomized, clinical, parallel group, assessor and data analyst blinded Pulmonary Protection Trial.

Authors:  Katrine B Buggeskov; Jørn Wetterslev; Niels H Secher; Lars W Andersen; Thomas Jonassen; Daniel A Steinbrüchel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Pulmonary artery perfusion versus no perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass for open heart surgery in adults.

Authors:  Katrine B Buggeskov; Lars Grønlykke; Emilie C Risom; Mao Ling Wei; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-08

6.  Pulmonary artery perfusion versus no pulmonary perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with COPD: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Katrine B Buggeskov; Martin M Sundskard; Thomas Jonassen; Lars W Andersen; Niels H Secher; Hanne B Ravn; Daniel A Steinbrüchel; Janus C Jakobsen; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2016-09-06

Review 7.  Pulmonary Protection Strategies in Cardiac Surgery: Are We Making Any Progress?

Authors:  Emad Al Jaaly; Mustafa Zakkar; Francesca Fiorentino; Gianni D Angelini
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Pulmonary Perfusion and Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Not Associated with Improved Postoperative Outcomes after Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Yiliam F Rodriguez-Blanco; Angela Gologorsky; Tomas Antonio Salerno; Kaming Lo; Edward Gologorsky
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.