OBJECTIVES: This study demonstrates the effects of nano-scale prepolymer particles as additives to model dental monomer and composite formulations. METHODS: Discrete nanogel particles were prepared by solution photopolymerization of isobornyl methacrylate and urethane dimethacrylate in the presence of a chain transfer agent, which also provided a means to attach reactive groups to the prepolymer. Nanogel was added to triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) in increments between 5 and 40 wt% with resin viscosity, reaction kinetics, shrinkage, mechanical properties, stress and optical properties evaluated. Maximum loading of barium glass filler was determined as a function of nanogel content and composites with varied nanogel content but uniform filler loading were compared in terms of consistency, conversion, shrinkage and mechanical properties. RESULTS: High conversion, high molecular weight internally crosslinked and cyclized nanogel prepolymer was efficiently prepared and redispersed into TEGDMA with an exponential rise in viscosity accompanying nanogel content. Nanogel addition at any level produced no deleterious effects on reaction kinetics, conversion or mechanical properties, as long as reactive nanogels were used. A reduction in polymerization shrinkage and stress was achieved in proportion to nanogel content. Even at high nanogel concentrations, the maximum loading of glass filler was only marginally reduced relative to the control and high strength composite materials with low shrinkage were obtained. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of reactive nanogels offers a versatile platform from which resin and composite handling properties can be adjusted while the polymerization shrinkage and stress development that challenge the adhesive bonding of dental restoratives are controllably reduced.
OBJECTIVES: This study demonstrates the effects of nano-scale prepolymer particles as additives to model dental monomer and composite formulations. METHODS: Discrete nanogel particles were prepared by solution photopolymerization of isobornyl methacrylate and urethane dimethacrylate in the presence of a chain transfer agent, which also provided a means to attach reactive groups to the prepolymer. Nanogel was added to triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) in increments between 5 and 40 wt% with resin viscosity, reaction kinetics, shrinkage, mechanical properties, stress and optical properties evaluated. Maximum loading of barium glass filler was determined as a function of nanogel content and composites with varied nanogel content but uniform filler loading were compared in terms of consistency, conversion, shrinkage and mechanical properties. RESULTS: High conversion, high molecular weight internally crosslinked and cyclized nanogel prepolymer was efficiently prepared and redispersed into TEGDMA with an exponential rise in viscosity accompanying nanogel content. Nanogel addition at any level produced no deleterious effects on reaction kinetics, conversion or mechanical properties, as long as reactive nanogels were used. A reduction in polymerization shrinkage and stress was achieved in proportion to nanogel content. Even at high nanogel concentrations, the maximum loading of glass filler was only marginally reduced relative to the control and high strength composite materials with low shrinkage were obtained. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of reactive nanogels offers a versatile platform from which resin and composite handling properties can be adjusted while the polymerization shrinkage and stress development that challenge the adhesive bonding of dental restoratives are controllably reduced.
Authors: Antonio Fernández-Barbero; Iván J Suárez; B Sierra-Martín; A Fernández-Nieves; F Javier de Las Nieves; Manuel Marquez; J Rubio-Retama; Enrique López-Cabarcos Journal: Adv Colloid Interface Sci Date: 2008-12-25 Impact factor: 12.984
Authors: Ronald A Siegel; Yuandong Gu; Ming Lei; Antonio Baldi; Eric E Nuxoll; Babak Ziaie Journal: J Control Release Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: R R Morães; J W Garcia; N D Wilson; S H Lewis; M D Barros; B Yang; C S Pfeifer; J W Stansbury Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Michael D Weir; Jennifer L Moreau; Eric D Levine; Howard E Strassler; Laurence C Chow; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2012-03-18 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Andres Gonzalez-Bonet; Gili Kaufman; Yin Yang; Christopher Wong; Abigail Jackson; George Huyang; Rafael Bowen; Jirun Sun Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Valeria B Gotti; Américo B Correr; Steven H Lewis; Victor P Feitosa; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Jeffrey W Stansbury Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Han Byul Song; Nancy Sowan; Parag K Shah; Austin Baranek; Alexander Flores; Jeffrey W Stansbury; Christopher N Bowman Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.304