Literature DB >> 21388127

Fast extraction and dilution flow injection mass spectrometry method for quantitative chemical residue screening in food.

Sergio C Nanita1, James J Stry, Anne M Pentz, Joseph P McClory, John H May.   

Abstract

A prototype multiresidue method based on fast extraction and dilution of samples followed by flow injection mass spectrometric analysis is proposed here for high-throughput chemical screening in complex matrices. The method was tested for sulfonylurea herbicides (triflusulfuron methyl, azimsulfuron, chlorimuron ethyl, sulfometuron methyl, chlorsulfuron, and flupyrsulfuron methyl), carbamate insecticides (oxamyl and methomyl), pyrimidine carboxylic acid herbicides (aminocyclopyrachlor and aminocyclopyrachlor methyl), and anthranilic diamide insecticides (chlorantraniliprole and cyantraniliprole). Lemon and pecan were used as representative high-water and low-water content matrices, respectively, and a sample extraction procedure was designed for each commodity type. Matrix-matched external standards were used for calibration, yielding linear responses with correlation coefficients (r) consistently >0.99. The limits of detection (LOD) were estimated to be between 0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg for all analytes, allowing execution of recovery tests with samples fortified at ≥0.05 mg/kg. Average analyte recoveries obtained during method validation for lemon and pecan ranged from 75 to 118% with standard deviations between 3 and 21%. Representative food processed fractions were also tested, that is, soybean oil and corn meal, yielding individual analyte average recoveries ranging from 62 to 114% with standard deviations between 4 and 18%. An intralaboratory blind test was also performed; the method excelled with 0 false positives and 0 false negatives in 240 residue measurements (20 samples × 12 analytes). The daily throughput of the fast extraction and dilution (FED) procedure is estimated at 72 samples/chemist, whereas the flow injection mass spectrometry (FI-MS) throughput could be as high as 4.3 sample injections/min, making very efficient use of mass spectrometers with negligible instrumental analysis time compared to the sample homogenization, preparation, and data processing steps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21388127     DOI: 10.1021/jf104237y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  3 in total

1.  Direct automatic determination of the methanol content in red wines based on the temperature effect of the KMnO4/K2S2O5/fuchsin sodium sulfite reaction system.

Authors:  Yong-Sheng Li; La-Mei Mo; Xiu-Feng Gao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  A flow-injection mass spectrometry fingerprinting scaffold for feature selection and quantitation of Cordyceps and Ganoderma extracts in beverage: a predictive artificial neural network modelling strategy.

Authors:  Chee Wei Lim; Siew Hoon Tai; Sheot Harn Chan
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 3.  Advantages and Pitfalls of Mass Spectrometry Based Metabolome Profiling in Systems Biology.

Authors:  Ina Aretz; David Meierhofer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.