Literature DB >> 21387952

Food safety perceptions and practices of older adults.

Amy L Anderson1, Linda A Verrill, Nadine R Sahyoun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Older adults are considered more vulnerable to foodborne illness due to lowered immune function. We compared the food safety perceptions and practices of older and younger adults and determined associations with demographic characteristics.
METHODS: We focused on 1,317 participants > or = 60 years of age from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's 2006 Food Safety Survey, a telephone survey of a nationally representative sample of American consumers. We used data on participants < 60 years of age to compare younger and older adults, and used Pearson's Chi-square tests to determine whether perceptions and practices differed by age, gender, level of education, living arrangement, and race/ethnicity. We conducted multiple logistic regression analysis to assess relationship of demographic characteristics and food safety perceptions with food safety practices of older adults.
RESULTS: We found that adults > or = 60 years of age were more likely to follow recommended food safety practices than those < 60 years of age. Sixty-six percent of adults > or = 60 years of age reported eating potentially hazardous foods in the past year compared with 81% of adults < 60 years of age. Among people > or = 60 years of age, women, those with less education, and nonwhite individuals generally had better food safety practices and a greater awareness of food safety risk.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that certain subsets of the older adult population are less likely to follow recommended food safety practices and, thus, are at greater risk of foodborne illness. Food safety education for older adults should target men and those with more education and higher incomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21387952      PMCID: PMC3056035          DOI: 10.1177/003335491112600213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  19 in total

1.  Consumer perceptions of food safety risk, control and responsibility.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Redmond; Christopher J Griffith
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Measuring the public's health.

Authors:  Stephen B Thacker; Donna F Stroup; Vilma Carande-Kulis; James S Marks; Kakoli Roy; Julie L Gerberding
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  The raw oyster consumer--a risk taker? Use of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  K C Klontz; J C Desenclos; L E Wolfe; S A Hoecherl; C Roberts; R A Gunn
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  A multi-state survey of consumer food-handling and food-consumption practices.

Authors:  S F Altekruse; S Yang; B B Timbo; F J Angulo
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Consumer food safety knowledge, practices, and demographic differences: findings from a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sumeet R Patil; Sheryl Cates; Roberta Morales
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.077

6.  Consumer knowledge of foodborne microbial hazards and food-handling practices.

Authors:  S F Altekruse; D A Street; S B Fein; A S Levy
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 7.  Foodborne illness in the elderly.

Authors:  J L Smith
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.077

8.  Raw shellfish consumption in California: the 1992 California Behavioral Risk Factor Survey.

Authors:  B B Timbo; S F Altekruse; M Headrick; K C Klontz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Food handling behaviors of special importance for pregnant women, infants and young children, the elderly, and immune-compromised people.

Authors:  Patricia Kendall; Lydia C Medeiros; Virginia Hillers; Gang Chen; Steve DiMascola
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2003-12

Review 10.  Food-related illness and death in the United States.

Authors:  P S Mead; L Slutsker; V Dietz; L F McCaig; J S Bresee; C Shapiro; P M Griffin; R V Tauxe
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The impact of socioeconomic status on foodborne illness in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  K L Newman; J S Leon; P A Rebolledo; E Scallan
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  From Cancer to Diarrhea: The Moving Target of Public Concern about Environmental Health Risks.

Authors:  Michele Morrone
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2011-11-24

3.  Food safety practices of food handlers at home engaged in online food businesses during COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines.

Authors:  Mark Raguindin Limon
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  Use of Focus Groups to Identify Food Safety Risks for Older Adults in the U.S.

Authors:  Melissa Kavanaugh; Kathleen Fisher; Jennifer J Quinlan
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-24

Review 5.  Listeria monocytogenes Cold Shock Proteins: Small Proteins with A Huge Impact.

Authors:  Francis Muchaamba; Roger Stephan; Taurai Tasara
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-14

6.  Public knowledge and preventive behavior during a large-scale Salmonella outbreak: results from an online survey in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Lex van Velsen; Desirée Jma Beaujean; Julia Ewc van Gemert-Pijnen; Jim E van Steenbergen; Aura Timen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.