Literature DB >> 21387932

Windsor, Ontario exposure assessment study: design and methods validation of personal, indoor, and outdoor air pollution monitoring.

Amanda J Wheeler1, Xiaohong Xu, Ryan Kulka, Hongyu You, Lance Wallace, Gary Mallach, Keith Van Ryswyk, Morgan MacNeill, Jill Kearney, Ewa Dabek-Zlotorzynska, Daniel Wang, Raymond Poon, Ron Williams, Corinne Stocco, Angelos Anastassopoulos, J David Miller, Robert Dales, Jeffrey R Brook.   

Abstract

The Windsor, Ontario Exposure Assessment Study evaluated the contribution of ambient air pollutants to personal and indoor exposures of adults and asthmatic children living in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. In addition, the role of personal, indoor, and outdoor air pollution exposures upon asthmatic children's respiratory health was assessed. Several active and passive sampling methods were applied, or adapted, for personal, indoor, and outdoor residential monitoring of nitrogen dioxide, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter (PM; PM < or = 2.5 microm [PM2.5] and < or = 10 microm [PM10] in aerodynamic diameter), elemental carbon, ultrafine particles, ozone, air exchange rates, allergens in settled dust, and particulate-associated metals. Participants completed five consecutive days of monitoring during the winter and summer of 2005 and 2006. During 2006, in addition to undertaking the air pollution measurements, asthmatic children completed respiratory health measurements (including peak flow meter tests and exhaled breath condensate) and tracked respiratory symptoms in a diary. Extensive quality assurance and quality control steps were implemented, including the collocation of instruments at the National Air Pollution Surveillance site operated by Environment Canada and at the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality site in Allen Park, Detroit, MI. During field sampling, duplicate and blank samples were also completed and these data are reported. In total, 50 adults and 51 asthmatic children were recruited to participate, resulting in 922 participant days of data. When comparing the methods used in the study with standard reference methods, field blanks were low and bias was acceptable, with most methods being within 20% of reference methods. Duplicates were typically within less than 10% of each other, indicating that study results can be used with confidence. This paper covers study design, recruitment, methodology, time activity diary, surveys, and quality assurance and control results for the different methods used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21387932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of inter-individual, geographic, and seasonal variability in estimated human exposure to fine particles.

Authors:  Wan Jiao; H Christopher Frey; Ye Cao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Physiological and perceived health effects from daily changes in air pollution and weather among persons with heart failure: a panel study.

Authors:  Mark S Goldberg; Amanda J Wheeler; Richard T Burnett; Nancy E Mayo; Marie-France Valois; James M Brophy; Nadia Giannetti
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Selection of metric for indoor-outdoor source apportionment of metals in PM2.5 : mg/kg versus ng/m3.

Authors:  Pat E Rasmussen; Christine Levesque; Owen Butler; Marc Chénier; H David Gardner
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 6.554

Review 4.  Individual-level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with long-term respiratory conditions.

Authors:  Sadia Janjua; Pippa Powell; Richard Atkinson; Elizabeth Stovold; Rebecca Fortescue
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-09

5.  Estimation of bias with the single-zone assumption in measurement of residential air exchange using the perfluorocarbon tracer gas method.

Authors:  K Van Ryswyk; L Wallace; D Fugler; M MacNeill; M È Héroux; M D Gibson; J R Guernsey; W Kindzierski; A J Wheeler
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 5.770

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.