Literature DB >> 21387867

Who does workforce planning well? Workforce review team rapid review summary.

J A Curson1, M E Dell, R A Wilson, D L Bosworth, B Baldauf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper sets out to disseminate new knowledge about workforce planning, a crucial health sector issue. The Health Select Committee criticised NHS England's failure to develop and apply effective workforce planning. The Workforce Review Team (WRT) commissioned the Institute for Employment Research, Warwick University, to undertake a "rapid review" of global literature to identify good practice. A workforce planning overview, its theoretical principles, good practice exemplars are provided before discussing their application to healthcare. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The literature review, undertaken September-November 2007, determined the current workforce planning evidence within and outside health service provision and any consensus on successful workforce planning.
FINDINGS: Much of the literature was descriptive and there was a lack of comparative or evaluative research-based evidence to inform U.K. healthcare workforce planning. Workforce planning practices were similar in other countries. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: There was no evidence to challenge current WRT approaches to NHS England workforce planning. There are a number of indications about how this might be extended and improved, given additional resources. The evidence-base for workforce planning would be strengthened by robust and authoritative studies. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Systematic workforce planning is a key healthcare quality management element. This review highlights useful information that can be turned into knowledge by informed application to the NHS. Best practice in other sectors and other countries appears to warrant exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21387867     DOI: 10.1108/09526861011010712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur        ISSN: 0952-6862


  6 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review of rapid review methods.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Jesmin Antony; Wasifa Zarin; Lisa Strifler; Marco Ghassemi; John Ivory; Laure Perrier; Brian Hutton; David Moher; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  A dynamic, multi-professional, needs-based simulation model to inform human resources for health planning.

Authors:  Adrian MacKenzie; Gail Tomblin Murphy; Rick Audas
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2019-06-13

3.  Workforce requirements in rheumatology: a systematic literature review informing the development of a workforce prediction risk of bias tool and the EULAR points to consider.

Authors:  Julia Unger; Polina Putrik; Frank Buttgereit; Daniel Aletaha; Gerolamo Bianchi; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Annelies Boonen; Nada Cikes; João Madruga Dias; Louise Falzon; Axel Finckh; Laure Gossec; Tore K Kvien; Eric L Matteson; Francisca Sivera; Tanja A Stamm; Zoltan Szekanecz; Dieter Wiek; Angela Zink; Christian Dejaco; Sofia Ramiro
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2018-12-05

4.  Workforce planning and development in times of delivery system transformation.

Authors:  Patricia Pittman; Ellen Scully-Russ
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2016-09-23

5.  Failing to retain a new generation of doctors: qualitative insights from a high-income country.

Authors:  Niamh Humphries; Sophie Crowe; Ruairí Brugha
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Hospital doctors in Ireland and the struggle for work-life balance.

Authors:  Niamh Humphries; Aoife M McDermott; Jennifer Creese; Anne Matthews; Edel Conway; John-Paul Byrne
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.367

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.