Literature DB >> 21386021

Clinical outcomes of a collaborative, home-based postdischarge warfarin management service.

Leanne Stafford1, Gregory M Peterson, Luke R E Bereznicki, Shane L Jackson, Ella C van Tienen, Manya T Angley, Beata V Bajorek, Andrew J McLachlan, Judy R Mullan, Gary M H Misan, Luigi Gaetani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Warfarin remains a high-risk drug for adverse events, especially following discharge from the hospital. New approaches are needed to minimize the potential for adverse outcomes during this period.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a collaborative, home-based postdischarge warfarin management service adapted from the Australian Home Medicines Review (HMR) program.
METHODS: In a prospective, nonrandomized controlled cohort study, patients discharged from the hospital and newly initiated on or continuing warfarin therapy received either usual care (UC) or a postdischarge service (PDS) of 2 or 3 home visits by a trained, HMR-accredited pharmacist in their first 8 to 10 days postdischarge. The PDS involved point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring, warfarin education, and an HMR, in collaboration with the patient's general practitioner and community pharmacist. The primary outcome measure was the combined incidence of major and minor hemorrhagic events in the 90 days postdischarge. Secondary outcome measures included the incidences of thrombotic events, combined hemorrhagic and thombotic events, unplanned and warfarin-related hospital readmissions, death, INR control, and persistence with therapy at 8 and 90 days postdischarge.
RESULTS: The PDS (n=129) was associated with statistically significantly decreased rates of combined major and minor hemorrhagic events to day 90 (5.3% vs 14.7%; p=0.03) and day 8 (0.9% vs 7.2%; p=0.01) compared with UC (n=139). The rate of combined hemorrhagic and thrombotic events to day 90 also decreased (6.4% vs 19.0%; p=0.008) and persistence with warfarin therapy improved (95.4% vs 83.6%; p=0.004). No significant differences in readmission and death rates or INR control were demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the ability of appropriately trained accredited pharmacists working within the Australian HMR framework to reduce adverse events and improve persistence in patients taking warfarin following hospital discharge. Widespread implementation of such a service has the potential to enhance medication safety along the continuum of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21386021     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1P617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  20 in total

1.  Contemporary approaches to managing atrial fibrillation: A survey of Australian general practitioners.

Authors:  Beata Bajorek; Parker Magin; Sarah Hilmer; Ines Krass
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2015-11-30

2.  A web-based training program to support chronic kidney disease screening by community pharmacists.

Authors:  Pankti A Gheewala; Gregory M Peterson; Syed Tabish R Zaidi; Luke Bereznicki; Matthew D Jose; Ronald L Castelino
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06-21

Review 3.  Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marlies M E Geurts; Jaap Talsma; Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Johan J de Gier
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Medication reviews.

Authors:  Alison Blenkinsopp; Christine Bond; David K Raynor
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  A systematic review of the role of community pharmacies in improving the transition from secondary to primary care.

Authors:  Hamde Nazar; Zachariah Nazar; Jane Portlock; Adam Todd; Sarah P Slight
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  High-risk medication in community care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Irina Dumitrescu; Minne Casteels; Kristel De Vliegher; Tinne Dilles
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  An evaluation of medication review reports across different settings.

Authors:  Christopher R Freeman; W Neil Cottrell; Greg Kyle; Ian D Williams; Lisa Nissen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-09-26

8.  Drug-related problems identified in post-discharge medication reviews for patients taking warfarin.

Authors:  Leanne Stafford; Andrew Stafford; Josephine Hughes; Manya Angley; Luke Bereznicki; Gregory Peterson
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-05-19

9.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

10.  Pharmacists' influence on adverse reactions to warfarin: a randomised controlled trial in elderly rural patients.

Authors:  Slaven Falamić; Marko Lucijanić; Maja Ortner-Hadžiabdić; Srećko Marušić; Vesna Bačić-Vrca
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2019-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.