Literature DB >> 21385920

Comparison of a simple dose-guided intervention technique for prostate radiotherapy with existing anatomical image guidance methods.

G Smyth1, H M McCallum, M J M Pearson, G P Lawrence.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A simple dose-guided intervention technique for prostate radiotherapy using an isodose overlay method combined with soft-tissue-based corrective couch shifts has been proposed previously. This planning study assesses the potential clinical impact of such a correction strategy.
METHODS: 10 patients, each with 8-11 on-treatment CT studies (n=97), were assessed using this technique and compared with no intervention, bony anatomy intervention and soft-tissue intervention methods. Each assessment technique used a 4-mm action level for intervention. Outcomes were evaluated using measures of sensitivity, specificity and dosimetric effect, and compared across intervention techniques. Dosimetric effect was defined as the change in dosimetric coverage by the 95% isodose from the no intervention case of an evaluation construct called the verification target volume.
RESULTS: Bony anatomy, soft tissue and dosimetric overlay-based interventions demonstrated sensitivity of 0.56, 0.73 and 1.00 and specificity of 0.64, 0.20 and 0.66, respectively. A detrimental dosimetric effect was shown in 7% of interventions for each technique, with benefit in 30%, 35% and 55% for bony anatomy, soft tissue and dosimetric overlay techniques, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Used in conjunction with soft-tissue-based corrective couch shifts, the dosimetric overlay technique allows effective filtering out of dosimetrically unnecessary interventions, making it more likely that any intervention made will result in improved target volume coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21385920      PMCID: PMC3473952          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/13032912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  16 in total

1.  Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging.

Authors:  John M Schallenkamp; Michael G Herman; Jon J Kruse; Thomas M Pisansky
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Adaptive modification of treatment planning to minimize the deleterious effects of treatment setup errors.

Authors:  D Yan; J Wong; F Vicini; J Michalski; C Pan; A Frazier; E Horwitz; A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-09

4.  Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer by CT-linear accelerator combination: prostate movements and dosimetric considerations.

Authors:  James R Wong; Lisa Grimm; Minoru Uematsu; Reva Oren; Chee Wai Cheng; Scott Merrick; Peter Schiff
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jean Pouliot; Ali Bani-Hashemi; Josephine Chen; Michelle Svatos; Farhad Ghelmansarai; Matthias Mitschke; Michele Aubin; Ping Xia; Olivier Morin; Kara Bucci; Mack Roach; Paco Hernandez; Zirao Zheng; Dimitre Hristov; Lynn Verhey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Initial experience with megavoltage (MV) CT guidance for daily prostate alignments.

Authors:  Katja M Langen; Yashan Zhang; Rhonda D Andrews; Monica E Hurley; Sanford L Meeks; Darrell O Poole; Twyla R Willoughby; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  An evaluation of Beam cath in the verification process for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  H A McNair; C Parker; V N Hansen; L Askew; R Mukherjee; C Nutting; A R Norman; D P Dearnaley
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  A dose distribution overlay technique for image guidance during prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  G Smyth; H M McCallum; E L Lambert; G P Lawrence
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning.

Authors:  C Fiorino; M Reni; A Bolognesi; G M Cattaneo; R Calandrino
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging.

Authors:  A Bel; P H Vos; P T Rodrigus; C L Creutzberg; A G Visser; J C Stroom; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.