AIM: Hospital autopsy rates have been falling steadily over recent decades. One factor that has been implicated in this decline is the perception that the general public views postmortem examinations unfavourably and that this often makes clinicians reluctant to discuss autopsy with families and seek their consent. The aim of this study was to test this assumption. OBJECTIVES/ METHODS: In the division of lymphoid malignancies at St Bartholomew's Hospital, we suggested autopsy and discussed it in depth with the families of all the patients who died in hospital in an 8-month period in order to assess whether the autopsy rate could be increased by improving the approach to the relatives. RESULTS: Consent for a postmortem examination was requested in 18 of 23 cases and granted in 16 cases, giving a consent rate of 89%, and an overall rate of autopsy of 69.5%. CONCLUSION: The attitude of the general public is positive overall, and translates into high autopsy rates when the value of the examination is presented honestly and the details of the procedure are adequately explained.
AIM: Hospital autopsy rates have been falling steadily over recent decades. One factor that has been implicated in this decline is the perception that the general public views postmortem examinations unfavourably and that this often makes clinicians reluctant to discuss autopsy with families and seek their consent. The aim of this study was to test this assumption. OBJECTIVES/ METHODS: In the division of lymphoid malignancies at St Bartholomew's Hospital, we suggested autopsy and discussed it in depth with the families of all the patients who died in hospital in an 8-month period in order to assess whether the autopsy rate could be increased by improving the approach to the relatives. RESULTS: Consent for a postmortem examination was requested in 18 of 23 cases and granted in 16 cases, giving a consent rate of 89%, and an overall rate of autopsy of 69.5%. CONCLUSION: The attitude of the general public is positive overall, and translates into high autopsy rates when the value of the examination is presented honestly and the details of the procedure are adequately explained.
Authors: Sheri L Spunt; Sara O Vargas; Cheryl M Coffin; Stephen X Skapek; David M Parham; Joan Darling; Douglas S Hawkins; Charles Keller Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Philip Eichhorn; Udo Andraschke; Fritz Dross; Carol I Geppert; Arndt Hartmann; Tilman T Rau Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Matthew S Kelly; Lisa Spees; Richard Vinesett; Andre Stokhuyzen; Lauren McGill; Alan D Proia; Kirsten Jenkins; Mehreen Arshad; Patrick C Seed; Paul L Martin Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Ian S D Roberts; Rachel E Benamore; Emyr W Benbow; Stephen H Lee; Jonathan N Harris; Alan Jackson; Susan Mallett; Tufail Patankar; Charles Peebles; Carl Roobottom; Zoe C Traill Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Britt M Blokker; Ivo M Wagensveld; Annick C Weustink; J Wolter Oosterhuis; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 5.315