Literature DB >> 21385889

Effective quality improvement of thromboprophylaxis in acute medicine.

Barbara M Clark1, Grainne d'Ancona, Mark Kinirons, Beverley J Hunt, Adrian Hopper.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Health Select Committee Report on the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 2005 suggested that poor awareness of the risks of VTE contributed significantly to mortality and morbidity in hospitalised patients. It recommended that all hospitalised patients should undergo a VTE risk assessment. In 2006, an audit in medical patients at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTFT) revealed a lack of documentation of VTE risk assessment and poor use of thromboprophylaxis in 'at risk' patients. In 2007, the GSTFT 'Venous Thromboembolism in Adult Medical Inpatients' guideline was approved. The aim was to achieve a thromboprophylaxis culture within Acute Medicine and, in doing so, achieve a high adherence rate.
METHODS: The guideline was launched and implemented using a multidisciplinary and multiple intervention approach involving education and feedback, IT intervention, verbal and written reminders, regular audit and process redesign.
RESULTS: An audit in 2008 showed that the rate of adherence had increased from 56% preguideline to 96%. However, a repeat audit in 2009 suggested that even though the majority of patients were receiving appropriate thromboprophylaxis, risk assessment documentation was poor. This resulted in treatment being provided to some low-risk patients when it was not required.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the most effective means of achieving VTE guideline adherence is to establish a thromboprophylaxis culture. This can be accomplished through a multiple intervention and continuous feedback approach. However, it is essential to ensure that a comprehensive VTE risk assessment is carried out to ensure that those not requiring treatment do not receive it unnecessarily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21385889     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.044503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  5 in total

1.  Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians' rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations.

Authors:  Ugochi Nwulu; Hannah Brooks; Suzanna Richardson; Lorraine McFarland; Jamie J Coleman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Venous thromboembolism capture on electronic systems in obstetrics patients at St Thomas' Hospital.

Authors:  Aminah Noor Ahmad; Megan Leyla Byrne; Nazia Imambaccus; Dawid Hubert; Anna Gateley; Salwa Abdullahi Idle; Jilly Lloyd
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2016-10-19

3.  The implementation of NICE guidance on venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis: a before-after observational study to assess the impact on patient safety across four hospitals in England.

Authors:  Alice G Bateman; Rod Sheaff; Susan Child; Olga Boiko; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Tim Nokes; Adrian Copplestone; Christian A Gericke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Practices to prevent venous thromboembolism: a brief review.

Authors:  Brandyn D Lau; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Improving venous thromboembolism risk assessment rates in a tertiary urology department.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mabey; Samiha Ismail; Falguni Tailor
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2017-11-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.