BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Imperforate tracheary elements (ITEs) in wood of vessel-bearing angiosperms may or may not transport water. Despite the significance of hydraulic transport for defining ITE types, the combination of cell structure with water transport visualization in planta has received little attention. This study provides a quantitative analysis of structural features associated with the conductive vs. non-conductive nature of ITEs. METHODS: Visualization of water transport was studied in 15 angiosperm species by dye injection and cryo-scanning electron microscopy. Structural features of ITEs were examined using light and electron microscopy. KEY RESULTS: ITEs connected to each other by pit pairs with complete pit membranes contributed to water transport, while cells showing pit membranes with perforations up to 2 µm were hydraulically not functional. A close relationship was found between pit diameter and pit density, with both characters significantly higher in conductive than in non-conductive cells. In species with both conductive and non-conductive ITEs, a larger diameter was characteristic of the conductive cells. Water transport showed no apparent relationship with the length of ITEs and vessel grouping. CONCLUSIONS: The structure and density of pits between ITEs represent the main anatomical characters determining water transport. The pit membrane structure of ITEs provides a reliable, but practically challenging, criterion to determine their conductive status. It is suggested that the term tracheids should strictly be used for conductive ITEs, while fibre-tracheids and libriform fibres are non-conductive.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Imperforate tracheary elements (ITEs) in wood of vessel-bearing angiosperms may or may not transport water. Despite the significance of hydraulic transport for defining ITE types, the combination of cell structure with water transport visualization in planta has received little attention. This study provides a quantitative analysis of structural features associated with the conductive vs. non-conductive nature of ITEs. METHODS: Visualization of water transport was studied in 15 angiosperm species by dye injection and cryo-scanning electron microscopy. Structural features of ITEs were examined using light and electron microscopy. KEY RESULTS: ITEs connected to each other by pit pairs with complete pit membranes contributed to water transport, while cells showing pit membranes with perforations up to 2 µm were hydraulically not functional. A close relationship was found between pit diameter and pit density, with both characters significantly higher in conductive than in non-conductive cells. In species with both conductive and non-conductive ITEs, a larger diameter was characteristic of the conductive cells. Water transport showed no apparent relationship with the length of ITEs and vessel grouping. CONCLUSIONS: The structure and density of pits between ITEs represent the main anatomical characters determining water transport. The pit membrane structure of ITEs provides a reliable, but practically challenging, criterion to determine their conductive status. It is suggested that the term tracheids should strictly be used for conductive ITEs, while fibre-tracheids and libriform fibres are non-conductive.
Authors: Steven Jansen; Emmanuelle Gortan; Frederic Lens; Maria Assunta Lo Gullo; Sebastiano Salleo; Alexander Scholz; Anke Stein; Patrizia Trifilò; Andrea Nardini Journal: New Phytol Date: 2010-09-14 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Ilja Kaufmann; Thomas Schulze-Till; Heike U Schneider; Ulrich Zimmermann; Peter Jakob; Lars H Wegner Journal: New Phytol Date: 2009-06-26 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Luciano Pereira; Denisele N A Flores-Borges; Paulo R L Bittencourt; Juliana L S Mayer; Eduardo Kiyota; Pedro Araújo; Steven Jansen; Raul O Freitas; Rafael S Oliveira; Paulo Mazzafera Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Ya Zhang; Laurent J Lamarque; José M Torres-Ruiz; Bernhard Schuldt; Zohreh Karimi; Shan Li; De-Wen Qin; Paulo Bittencourt; Régis Burlett; Kun-Fang Cao; Sylvain Delzon; Rafael Oliveira; Luciano Pereira; Steven Jansen Journal: Tree Physiol Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 4.196