OBJECTIVES: The impact of oseltamivir on mortality in critically ill patients with 2009 pandemic influenza A (2009 H1N1) is not clear. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the timing of antiviral administration and intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes. METHODS: Prospective, observational study of a cohort of ICU patients with confirmed 2009 H1N1 infection. Clinical data, treatment and outcome were compared between patients receiving early treatment (ET) with oseltamivir, initiated within 2 days, and patients administered late treatment (LT), initiated after this timepoint. Multivariate analysis and propensity score were used to determine the effect of oseltamivir on ICU mortality. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Four hundred and four (61.5%) patients required mechanical ventilation (MV; mortality 32.6%). Among them, 385 received effective antiviral therapy and were included in the study group. All patients received oseltamivir for a median duration of 10 days (interquartile range 8-14 days). Seventy-nine (20.5%) ET patients were compared with 306 LT patients. The two groups were comparable in terms of main clinical variables. ICU length of stay (22.7 ± 16.7 versus 18.4 ± 14.2 days; P = 0.03), hospital length of stay (34.0 ± 20.3 versus 27.2 ± 18.2 days; P = 0.001) and MV days (17.4 ± 15.2 versus 14.0 ± 12.4; P = 0.04) were higher in the LT group. ICU mortality was also higher in LT (34.3%) than in ET (21.5%; OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.06-3.41). A multivariate model identified ET (OR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.87) as an independent variable associated with reduced ICU mortality. These results were confirmed by propensity score analysis (OR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.22-0.90; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that early oseltamivir administration was associated with favourable outcomes among critically ill ventilated patients with 2009 H1N1 virus infection.
OBJECTIVES: The impact of oseltamivir on mortality in critically illpatients with 2009 pandemic influenza A (2009 H1N1) is not clear. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the timing of antiviral administration and intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes. METHODS: Prospective, observational study of a cohort of ICU patients with confirmed 2009 H1N1infection. Clinical data, treatment and outcome were compared between patients receiving early treatment (ET) with oseltamivir, initiated within 2 days, and patients administered late treatment (LT), initiated after this timepoint. Multivariate analysis and propensity score were used to determine the effect of oseltamivir on ICU mortality. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Four hundred and four (61.5%) patients required mechanical ventilation (MV; mortality 32.6%). Among them, 385 received effective antiviral therapy and were included in the study group. All patients received oseltamivir for a median duration of 10 days (interquartile range 8-14 days). Seventy-nine (20.5%) ET patients were compared with 306 LT patients. The two groups were comparable in terms of main clinical variables. ICU length of stay (22.7 ± 16.7 versus 18.4 ± 14.2 days; P = 0.03), hospital length of stay (34.0 ± 20.3 versus 27.2 ± 18.2 days; P = 0.001) and MV days (17.4 ± 15.2 versus 14.0 ± 12.4; P = 0.04) were higher in the LT group. ICU mortality was also higher in LT (34.3%) than in ET (21.5%; OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.06-3.41). A multivariate model identified ET (OR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.87) as an independent variable associated with reduced ICU mortality. These results were confirmed by propensity score analysis (OR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.22-0.90; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that early oseltamivir administration was associated with favourable outcomes among critically ill ventilated patients with 2009 H1N1 virus infection.
Authors: Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Marcus J Schultz; Jean-Louis Vincent; Francisco Alvarez-Lerma; Lieuwe D Bos; Jordi Solé-Violán; Antoni Torres; Alejandro Rodriguez Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Jesús Castilla; Pere Godoy; Vicente Martín; Nuria Soldevila; Jordi Alonso; Jenaro Astray; Maretva Baricot; Rafael Cantón; Ady Castro; Fernando Gónzález-Candelas; José María Mayoral; José María Quintana; Tomás Pumarola; Sonia Tamames; Marc Sáez; Angela Domínguez Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Emili Díaz; Loreto Vidaur; Antoni Torres; Cesar Laborda; Rosa Granada; Juan Bonastre; Mar Martín; Josu Insausti; Angel Arenzana; Jose Eugenio Guerrero; Ines Navarrete; Jesus Bermejo-Martin; David Suarez; Alejandro Rodriguez Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: A Domínguez; A Romero-Tamarit; N Soldevila; P Godoy; M Jané; A Martínez; N Torner; J A Caylà; C Rius Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 4.434