Literature DB >> 21385211

Chilean blue whales as a case study to illustrate methods to estimate abundance and evaluate conservation status of rare species.

Rob Williams1, Sharon L Hedley, Trevor A Branch, Mark V Bravington, Alexandre N Zerbini, Ken P Findlay.   

Abstract

Often abundance of rare species cannot be estimated with conventional design-based methods, so we illustrate with a population of blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) a spatial model-based method to estimate abundance. We analyzed data from line-transect surveys of blue whales off the coast of Chile, where the population was hunted to low levels. Field protocols allowed deviation from planned track lines to collect identification photographs and tissue samples for genetic analyses, which resulted in an ad hoc sampling design with increased effort in areas of higher densities. Thus, we used spatial modeling methods to estimate abundance. Spatial models are increasingly being used to analyze data from surveys of marine, aquatic, and terrestrial species, but estimation of uncertainty from such models is often problematic. We developed a new, broadly applicable variance estimator that showed there were likely 303 whales (95% CI 176-625) in the study area. The survey did not span the whales' entire range, so this is a minimum estimate. We estimated current minimum abundance relative to pre-exploitation abundance (i.e., status) with a population dynamics model that incorporated our minimum abundance estimate, likely population growth rates from a meta-analysis of rates of increase in large baleen whales, and two alternative assumptions about historic catches. From this model, we estimated that the population was at a minimum of 16.5% (95% CI 7.3-34.4%) of pre-exploitation levels in 1998 under one catch assumption and 12.4% (CI 5.4-26.3%) of pre-exploitation levels under the other. Thus, although Chilean blue whales are probably still at a small fraction of pre-exploitation abundance, even these minimum abundance estimates demonstrate that their status is better than that of Antarctic blue whales, which are still <1% of pre-exploitation population size. We anticipate our methods will be broadly applicable in aquatic and terrestrial surveys for rarely encountered species, especially when the surveys are intended to maximize encounter rates and estimate abundance. ©2011 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21385211     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01656.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  13 in total

1.  Estimates of Abundance and Trend of Chilean Blue Whales off Isla de Chiloé, Chile.

Authors:  Barbara Galletti Vernazzani; Jennifer A Jackson; Elsa Cabrera; Carole A Carlson; Robert L Brownell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Defining priority areas for blue whale conservation and investigating overlap with vessel traffic in Chilean Patagonia, using a fast-fitting movement model.

Authors:  Luis Bedriñana-Romano; Rodrigo Hucke-Gaete; Francisco A Viddi; Devin Johnson; Alexandre N Zerbini; Juan Morales; Bruce Mate; Daniel M Palacios
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Global coverage of cetacean line-transect surveys: status quo, data gaps and future challenges.

Authors:  Kristin Kaschner; Nicola J Quick; Rebecca Jewell; Rob Williams; Catriona M Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Seasonal and geographic variation of southern blue whale subspecies in the Indian Ocean.

Authors:  Flore Samaran; Kathleen M Stafford; Trevor A Branch; Jason Gedamke; Jean-Yves Royer; Robert P Dziak; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for surveying marine fauna: a dugong case study.

Authors:  Amanda Hodgson; Natalie Kelly; David Peel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Counting whales in a challenging, changing environment.

Authors:  R Williams; N Kelly; O Boebel; A S Friedlaender; H Herr; K-H Kock; L S Lehnert; T Maksym; J Roberts; M Scheidat; U Siebert; A S Brierley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High genetic diversity in a small population: the case of Chilean blue whales.

Authors:  Juan P Torres-Florez; Rodrigo Hucke-Gaete; Howard Rosenbaum; Christian C Figueroa
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Mapping seabird sensitivity to offshore wind farms.

Authors:  Gareth Bradbury; Mark Trinder; Bob Furness; Alex N Banks; Richard W G Caldow; Duncan Hume
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Land-cover changes predict steep declines for the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii).

Authors:  Serge A Wich; Ian Singleton; Matthew G Nowak; Sri Suci Utami Atmoko; Gonda Nisam; Sugesti Mhd Arif; Rudi H Putra; Rio Ardi; Gabriella Fredriksson; Graham Usher; David L A Gaveau; Hjalmar S Kühl
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Estimation of free-roaming domestic dog population size: Investigation of three methods including an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) based approach.

Authors:  Charlotte Warembourg; Monica Berger-González; Danilo Alvarez; Filipe Maximiano Sousa; Alexis López Hernández; Pablo Roquel; Joe Eyerman; Merlin Benner; Salome Dürr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.