| Literature DB >> 21383984 |
Anne Liljander1, Philip Bejon, Jedidah Mwacharo, Oscar Kai, Edna Ogada, Norbert Peshu, Kevin Marsh, Anna Färnert.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Protective immunity to malaria is acquired after repeated infections in endemic areas. Asymptomatic multiclonal P. falciparum infections are common and may predict host protection. Here, we have investigated the effect of clearing asymptomatic infections on the risk of clinical malaria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21383984 PMCID: PMC3044709 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016940
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Parasitological characteristics at three-monthly cross-sectional surveys.
| Before treatment | After treatment | ||||
| Survey 1 (Feb 2005) | Survey 2 (May 2005) | Survey 3 (Aug 2005) | Survey 4 (Jan 2006) | ||
| Parasite prevalence, % (95% CI) | microscopy | 72.1 (67–77) | 48.2 (43–53) | 29.1 (24–34) | 32.9 (27–38) |
| PCR | 78.0 (74–83) | 59.0 (53–64) | 37.5 (32–43) | 39.8 (34–45) | |
| Parasite density | 708.0 (547.0–920.5) | 223.9 (180.7–283.8) | 112.2 (90.6–140.6) | 120.2 (97.7–154.5) | |
In microscopy positive children.
Anti-malarial treatment was given to clear all asymptomatic parasiteamias just after survey 2.
Figure 1Number (A) and proportion (B) of asymptomatic children infected with different number of msp2 clones.
Figure 2Intra-individual correlation in number of infecting clones between surveys without (A and C) and with treatment (B).
Factors associated with risk of subsequent clinical malaria during follow-up with and without anti-malarial treatment after survey.
| No treatment after survey | Treatment after survey | ||||
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
| ||
|
| 0 | 0.47 (0.22–0.98) | 0.045 | 0.52 (0.27–0.99) | 0.045 |
| 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| ≥2 | 1.15 (0.60–2.19) | 0.67 | 0.46 (0.23–0.91) | 0.026 | |
| Age | 0.81 (0.66–0.98) | 0.027 | 0.76 (0.63–0.92) | 0.006 | |
| High transmission | 0.69 (0.41–1.18) | 0.18 | 0.82 (0.48–1.41) | 0.48 | |
| ITN | 1.01 (0.58–1.77) | 0.97 | 0.35 (0.17–0.75) | 0.007 | |
Pooled data from surveys 1, 3 and 4.
Data from survey 2.
*Reference group.
Figure 3Kaplan Meier estimate of time to subsequent clinical episode without and with treatment following survey.
Factors associated with re-infection, asymptomatic parasiteamia or clinical malaria during follow-up after anti-malarial treatment.
| Re-infected vs uninfected | Clinical malaria vs asymptomatic infection | ||||
| Odds ratio (95% CI) |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) |
| ||
|
| 0 | 1.10 (0.55–2.19) | 0.795 | 0.19 (0.05–0.73) | 0.015 |
| 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| ≥2 | 1.97 (0.99–3.93) | 0.053 | 0.06 (0.02–0.25) | <0.001 | |
| Age | 0.97 (0.84–1.13) | 0.301 | 0.51 (0.37–0.71) | 0.001 | |
| High transmission | 2.23 (1.40–3.56) | 0.001 | 0.14 (0.06–0.36) | 0.056 | |
| ITN | 0.59 (0.35–1.02) | 0.058 | 0.42 (0.14–1.26) | 0.122 | |
*Reference group.
Figure 4Kaplan Meier estimate of time to subsequent clinical episode with treatment excluding children who remained uninfected during follow-up.