Literature DB >> 21383415

Matching split distance for unrooted binary phylogenetic trees.

Damian Bogdanowicz1, Krzysztof Giaro.   

Abstract

The reconstruction of evolutionary trees is one of the primary objectives in phylogenetics. Such a tree represents the historical evolutionary relationship between different species or organisms. Tree comparisons are used for multiple purposes, from unveiling the history of species to deciphering evolutionary associations among organisms and geographical areas. In this paper, we propose a new method of defining distances between unrooted binary phylogenetic trees that is especially useful for relatively large phylogenetic trees. Next, we investigate in detail the properties of one example of these metrics, called the Matching Split distance, and describe how the general method can be extended to nonbinary trees.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21383415     DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2011.48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  16 in total

1.  Comparing Phylogenetic Trees by Matching Nodes Using the Transfer Distance Between Partitions.

Authors:  Damian Bogdanowicz; Krzysztof Giaro
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Fundamental evolution of all Orthocoronavirinae including three deadly lineages descendent from Chiroptera-hosted coronaviruses: SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Denis Jacob Machado; Rachel Scott; Sayal Guirales; Daniel A Janies
Journal:  Cladistics       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.254

3.  Fundamental evolution of all Orthocoronavirinae including three deadly lineages descendent from Chiroptera-hosted coronaviruses: SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Denis Jacob Machado; Rachel Scott; Sayal Guirales; Daniel A Janies
Journal:  Cladistics       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.714

4.  Concordance and discordance of sequence survey methods for molecular epidemiology.

Authors:  Eduardo Castro-Nallar; Nur A Hasan; Thomas A Cebula; Rita R Colwell; Richard A Robison; W Evan Johnson; Keith A Crandall
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  YBYRÁ facilitates comparison of large phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Denis Jacob Machado
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Conserved Nonexonic Elements: A Novel Class of Marker for Phylogenomics.

Authors:  Scott V Edwards; Alison Cloutier; Allan J Baker
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Minimum variance rooting of phylogenetic trees and implications for species tree reconstruction.

Authors:  Uyen Mai; Erfan Sayyari; Siavash Mirarab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Phage cluster relationships identified through single gene analysis.

Authors:  Kyle C Smith; Eduardo Castro-Nallar; Joshua Nb Fisher; Donald P Breakwell; Julianne H Grose; Sandra H Burnett
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Inferring species trees from incongruent multi-copy gene trees using the Robinson-Foulds distance.

Authors:  Ruchi Chaudhary; John Gordon Burleigh; David Fernández-Baca
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.405

10.  TreeShrink: fast and accurate detection of outlier long branches in collections of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Uyen Mai; Siavash Mirarab
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.