BACKGROUND: Individuals aged 80 years and older is the fastest growing segment of the population worldwide. To understand the biology behind increasing longevity, it is important to examine factors related to survival in this age group. The relationship between brain atrophy and survival after age 85 remains unclear. METHODS: A population-based sample (n = 239) had head CT scans at age 85 and was then followed until death. Cortical atrophy and ventricular size were assessed. Statistical analyses included Cox proportional hazards models with time to death as the outcome and considering a large number of possible confounders, including baseline cognitive function, incident dementia, and somatic disorders. RESULTS: Mean survival time (±SD) was 5.0 ± 3.6 years (range 0.10-19.8 years). Decreased survival was associated with temporal, and frontal atrophy, sylvian fissure width and a number of ventricular measures after adjustment for potential confounders. In participants without dementia at baseline (n = 135), decreased survival was associated with temporal lobe atrophy and bifrontal ratio. In those with dementia (n = 104), decreased survival was associated with third ventricle width, cella media ratio, and ventricle-to-brain and ventricle-to-cranial ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Several indices of brain atrophy were related to decreased survival after age 85, regardless of dementia status. Brain atrophy is rarely mentioned as a significant indicator of survival in the elderly, independent of traditional predictors such as cardiovascular disease or cancer. The biology behind the influence of brain atrophy on survival needs to be further scrutinized.
BACKGROUND: Individuals aged 80 years and older is the fastest growing segment of the population worldwide. To understand the biology behind increasing longevity, it is important to examine factors related to survival in this age group. The relationship between brain atrophy and survival after age 85 remains unclear. METHODS: A population-based sample (n = 239) had head CT scans at age 85 and was then followed until death. Cortical atrophy and ventricular size were assessed. Statistical analyses included Cox proportional hazards models with time to death as the outcome and considering a large number of possible confounders, including baseline cognitive function, incident dementia, and somatic disorders. RESULTS: Mean survival time (±SD) was 5.0 ± 3.6 years (range 0.10-19.8 years). Decreased survival was associated with temporal, and frontal atrophy, sylvian fissure width and a number of ventricular measures after adjustment for potential confounders. In participants without dementia at baseline (n = 135), decreased survival was associated with temporal lobe atrophy and bifrontal ratio. In those with dementia (n = 104), decreased survival was associated with third ventricle width, cella media ratio, and ventricle-to-brain and ventricle-to-cranial ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Several indices of brain atrophy were related to decreased survival after age 85, regardless of dementia status. Brain atrophy is rarely mentioned as a significant indicator of survival in the elderly, independent of traditional predictors such as cardiovascular disease or cancer. The biology behind the influence of brain atrophy on survival needs to be further scrutinized.
Authors: M Arfan Ikram; Meike W Vernooij; Henri A Vrooman; Albert Hofman; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: F Barkhof; T M Polvikoski; E C W van Straaten; R N Kalaria; R Sulkava; H J Aronen; L Niinistö; S Rastas; M Oinas; P Scheltens; T Erkinjuntti Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-10-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sarah K Madsen; Boris A Gutman; Shantanu H Joshi; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Saskia S G C Van Elderen; Qian Zhang; Sigudur Sigurdsson; Thaddeus J Haight; Oscar Lopez; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Palmi Jonsson; Laura de Jong; Tamara B Harris; Melissa Garcia; Vilmundar Gudnason; Mark A van Buchem; Lenore J Launer Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Andre Monteiro; Muhammad Waqas; Hamid H Rai; Ammad A Baig; Rimal H Dossani; Justin M Cappuzzo; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 3.629
Authors: Dejan Jakimovski; Niels Bergsland; Michael G Dwyer; Jesper Hagemeier; Deepa P Ramasamy; Kinga Szigeti; Thomas Guttuso; David Lichter; David Hojnacki; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Ralph H B Benedict; Robert Zivadinov Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Davis C Woodworth; Kiana A Scambray; María M Corrada; Claudia H Kawas; S Ahmad Sajjadi Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Elijah Mak; Li Su; Guy B Williams; Michael J Firbank; Rachael A Lawson; Alison J Yarnall; Gordon W Duncan; Brit Mollenhauer; Adrian M Owen; Tien K Khoo; David J Brooks; James B Rowe; Roger A Barker; David J Burn; John T O'Brien Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 4.673