OBJECTIVE: To explore rates of screening and identification and treatment for behavioral problems using billing data from Massachusetts Medicaid immediately following the start of the state's new court-ordered screening and intervention program. DESIGN: Retrospective review of the number of pediatric well-child visits, number of screens, and number of screens that identify risk for psychosocial problems from January 2008 (the month pediatric screening started) to March 2009. During the surrounding 1-year period, we also examined the number of claims with a behavioral health evaluation code. SETTING: Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Massachusetts Medicaid-enrolled children. INTERVENTION: Funded court-ordered mandate to screen for mental health during Medicaid well-child visits. OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of visits with a screen, percentage of screens identified at risk, and number of children seen for behavioral health evaluations. RESULTS: Major increase from 16.6% of all Medicaid well-child visits coded for behavioral screens in the first quarter of 2008 to 53.6% in the first quarter of 2009. Additionally, the children identified as at risk increased substantially from about 1600 in the first quarter of 2008 to nearly 5000 in quarter 1 of 2009. The children with mental health evaluations increased from an average of 4543 to 5715 per month over a 1-year period. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest payment and a supported mandate for use of a formal screening tool can substantially increase the identification of children at behavioral health risk. Findings suggest that increased screening may have the desired effect of increasing referrals for mental health services.
OBJECTIVE: To explore rates of screening and identification and treatment for behavioral problems using billing data from Massachusetts Medicaid immediately following the start of the state's new court-ordered screening and intervention program. DESIGN: Retrospective review of the number of pediatric well-child visits, number of screens, and number of screens that identify risk for psychosocial problems from January 2008 (the month pediatric screening started) to March 2009. During the surrounding 1-year period, we also examined the number of claims with a behavioral health evaluation code. SETTING: Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Massachusetts Medicaid-enrolled children. INTERVENTION: Funded court-ordered mandate to screen for mental health during Medicaid well-child visits. OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of visits with a screen, percentage of screens identified at risk, and number of children seen for behavioral health evaluations. RESULTS: Major increase from 16.6% of all Medicaid well-child visits coded for behavioral screens in the first quarter of 2008 to 53.6% in the first quarter of 2009. Additionally, the children identified as at risk increased substantially from about 1600 in the first quarter of 2008 to nearly 5000 in quarter 1 of 2009. The children with mental health evaluations increased from an average of 4543 to 5715 per month over a 1-year period. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest payment and a supported mandate for use of a formal screening tool can substantially increase the identification of children at behavioral health risk. Findings suggest that increased screening may have the desired effect of increasing referrals for mental health services.
Authors: Barry Sarvet; Joseph Gold; Jeff Q Bostic; Bruce J Masek; Jefferson B Prince; Mary Jeffers-Terry; Charles F Moore; Benjamin Molbert; John H Straus Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Karen A Hacker; Robert Penfold; Lisa Arsenault; Fang Zhang; Michael Murphy; Larry Wissow Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Maria Paz Guzman; Michael Jellinek; Myriam George; Marcela Hartley; Ana Maria Squicciarini; Katia M Canenguez; Karen A Kuhlthau; Recai Yucel; Gwyne W White; Javier Guzman; J Michael Murphy Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Bonnie T Zima; J Michael Murphy; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood; Ramesh C Sachdeva; Rita Mangione-Smith; Donna Woods; Hayley S Kamin; Michael Jellinek Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Karen Hacker; Robert Penfold; Lisa N Arsenault; Fang Zhang; Stephen B Soumerai; Lawrence S Wissow Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Matthew G Biel; Nicole F Kahn; Anjuli Srivastava; Mihriye Mete; My K Banh; Lawrence S Wissow; Bruno J Anthony Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Inyang A Isong; Hugh Silk; Sowmya R Rao; James M Perrin; Judith A Savageau; Karen Donelan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: R Christopher Sheldrick; Brandi S Henson; Emily N Neger; Shela Merchant; J Michael Murphy; Ellen C Perrin Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Tamara D Simon; Mary Lawrence Cawthon; Susan Stanford; Jean Popalisky; Dorothy Lyons; Peter Woodcox; Margaret Hood; Alex Y Chen; Rita Mangione-Smith Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 7.124